**International Journal of Partial Differential Equations and Applications**

## DRBEM Applied to the 3D Helmholtz Equation and Its Particular Solutions with Various Radial Basis Functions

**Hassan Ghassemi**^{1,}, **Saeed Fazelifar**^{1}, **Alireza Nadery**^{1}

^{1}Department of Maritime Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

Abstract | |

1. | Introduction |

2. | Helmholtz Equation |

3. | Dual Reciprocity Method (DRM) |

4. | Particular Solutions |

5. | Numerical Results |

6. | Conclusions |

References |

### Abstract

This paper presents to solve the 3D Helmholtz equation using dual reciprocity boundary element method (DRBEM) and its particular solutions with various radial basis functions (RBFs). The important function in this method is to employ the RBF. Here, we find the particular solution of the Helmholtz equation (∇^{2}±*k*^{2})*h*= *f*(*r*), where *f*(*r*) is the RBF. Various RBFs are chosen and the particular solutions are obtained. The dual reciprocity method (DRM) is a method that converts the domain integral into the boundary integral. Mathematical formulations and discretization forms are described and discussed. Numerical results with three RBF with and without polynomial terms are presented and discussed. Algorithm of the method is also presented.

**Keywords:** 3D Helmholtz equation, radial basis function, particular solution, dual reciprocity method

**Copyright**© 2016 Science and Education Publishing. All Rights Reserved.

### Cite this article:

- Hassan Ghassemi, Saeed Fazelifar, Alireza Nadery. DRBEM Applied to the 3D Helmholtz Equation and Its Particular Solutions with Various Radial Basis Functions.
*International Journal of Partial Differential Equations and Applications*. Vol. 4, No. 1, 2016, pp 1-6. http://pubs.sciepub.com/ijpdea/4/1/1

- Ghassemi, Hassan, Saeed Fazelifar, and Alireza Nadery. "DRBEM Applied to the 3D Helmholtz Equation and Its Particular Solutions with Various Radial Basis Functions."
*International Journal of Partial Differential Equations and Applications*4.1 (2016): 1-6.

- Ghassemi, H. , Fazelifar, S. , & Nadery, A. (2016). DRBEM Applied to the 3D Helmholtz Equation and Its Particular Solutions with Various Radial Basis Functions.
*International Journal of Partial Differential Equations and Applications*,*4*(1), 1-6.

- Ghassemi, Hassan, Saeed Fazelifar, and Alireza Nadery. "DRBEM Applied to the 3D Helmholtz Equation and Its Particular Solutions with Various Radial Basis Functions."
*International Journal of Partial Differential Equations and Applications*4, no. 1 (2016): 1-6.

Import into BibTeX | Import into EndNote | Import into RefMan | Import into RefWorks |

### At a glance: Figures

### 1. Introduction

The boundary element method is a numerical method for solving partial differential equations encountered in mathematical physics and engineering ^{[1]}.The boundary element method can be viewed as some sort of half-way house between analytical and numerical methods ^{[2]}. According to work of Nardini and Brebbia (1982) ^{[3]}, there has been an increasing interest in using the Dual Reciprocity Method (DRM) to solve partial differential equations (PDEs) by boundary element methods (Partidge et al. 1992 ^{[4]} and Golberg and Chen 1997 ^{[5]}). The attractiveness of the DRM is its capability to transfer domain integration to the boundary integration. In the past, 1+r has been chosen as the ad-hoc basis function in the DRM ^{[6, 7]}. In 1994, Golberg and Chen ^{[7, 8]} provided theoretical evidence for the choice of the basic functions by using the RBFs in the DRM. On the issue of applicability, the DRM has been only applied to the case when the major differential operator is kept as the Laplace or in harmonic operator and the rest of the terms in the original differential are treated as a forcing term. This is primarily due to the difficulty in obtaining particular solutions in a closed form. As a result, the DRM is less effective when the forcing terms become too complicated ^{[10, 11]}. In general, we would like to keep forcing term as simple as possible to make better approximation by RBF. Meanwhile, the simpler the forcing term, the more complicated the differential operator becomes, and also the fundamental solution become more involved. So far, the choice of the main differential operator seems to be limited to Laplace and in harmonic operators due to difficulty of producing particular solutions in a closed form. A particular solution to the governing differential equation is then determined for each basis function ^{[12]}. In this regard, Zhu ^{[13]} attempted to using Helmholtz operators as the main differential operator in the DRM. The key ingredient in doing this is the ability to analytically calculate particular solutions for various linear PDEs, . This is usually done by approximating f by a series , and then solving , where is an appropriate set of linearly independent basis function. Hence, the choice of is important, and the analysis given in Golberg et al. (1998b). They defined that needs to provide an accurate approximation to b, and also it should be as a form that be solved analytically.

The following sections are organized as follows. Section 2 is described the physical problem and obtain the governing equation. Section 3 shows that how the DRM method converts the domain integral into the boundary integral. Section 4 finds analytical particular solutions for various RBF like simple function , thin plate Splines (TPS), and higher-order polyharmonic Splines. Then, applying the particular solutions is described in Section 5. Section 6 is discussed the numerical results and finally conclusions are given in Section 7.

### 2. Helmholtz Equation

The complete dynamic basic equations of the fluid are the mass continuity, Navier-stokes and energy equations ^{[14]}:

(1) |

Eq. (1) is the governing equation for the sound field in the three-dimensional flow.

The drawbacks of using the Laplace operator instead of the Helmholtz operator are:

(i) The information in the original differential equation is partially lost.

(ii) The forcing term becomes more complicated and difficult to interpolate by radial basis functions.

(iii) The solution may not even converge when k becomes large ^{[15]}.

### 3. Dual Reciprocity Method (DRM)

In the boundary element method, for a body of the boundary () and domain (), the integral formulation of the Eq. (1) may be expressed as:

(2) |

where:

(3) |

And is the Green’s function* *from the Helmholtz equation. For the 3D problems:

(4) |

Eq. (2) contains the volume integral, which is a difficult problem. Therefore, in order to overcome this difficulty, one of the easiest way is converting volume integral into the boundary integral via DRM [3-16]^{[3]}. This method focuses to the term which may be approximated by the following expression,

(5) |

where are interpolation coefficients and radial basis function (RBF), respectively. N is the number of collocation nodes along the boundary, L is the number of collocation points inside the domain, and is defined as the distance between the node under consideration and the node i.

For each simple source function , a particular solution needs to be found and satisfied as:

(6) |

Hereafter, the particular solution of the Eq. (6) was obtained by some various RBFs.

Substituting equations (6) and (5) into Eq. (2) yields:

(7) |

Discretization form of the Eq. (7) can be represented as follows:

(8) |

where and are influence coefficients, and defined as follows:

(9) |

These integrals can be evaluated by numerical and analytical methods.

By verifying it in detail:

(10) |

where is the Kronecker delta, which is defined as for , and for .

Eq. (8) may further be written as:

(11) |

where * *is obtained in Section 4.

### 4. Particular Solutions

First, we introduce some RBFs as given:

Linear classic:

(12) |

TPS:

(13) |

Higher-order Spline:

(14) |

**4.1. Classical RBF**

By substituting Eq. (12) into Eq. (6), the particular solution of the Eq. (6) can be found as follows:

(15) |

Since this solution is axisymmetric with respect to the source, it is independent of the polar angle , and thus Eq. (15) becomes ^{[17]}:

(16) |

A regular solution of Eq. (16) is obtained ^{[13, 14]}:

(17) |

Where:

(18) |

**4.2. Thin Plate Spline (TPS)**

We consider an approach, usually called the “annihilator method” as described in Ref. ^{[18]}. Here, it is assumed that there is a linear partial differential operator which satisfies

(19) |

And commutes with i.e., and then:

(20) |

If the solution sets, and , are finite and disjoint, then

(21) |

where is a basis for , is a basis for , and . The coefficients and are determined by requiring and additional regularity conditions (Golberg and Chen 1997 ^{[5]} and Golberget al. 1998a ^{[21]}).

By substituting Eq. (13) into Eq. (6), the particular solution of the Eq. (6) in 2D can be found as follows:

(22) |

And for we have:

(23) |

Now, with respect to Eqs. (19, 20), and Eq. (21):

(24) |

can be obtained by solving . For radially symmetric solutions, it is equivalent to solve:

(25) |

can be obtained by solving:

(26) |

Since is a Bessel operator (Derrick and Grossman 1976 ^{[19]}):

(27) |

where and are Bessel functions of order zero.

Since is a multiple of an Euler operator, must satisfy the characteristic equation , (Derrick and Grossman 1976 ^{[19]})

(28) |

Thus,

(29) |

The coefficients are found by requiring and the condition that should be continuous at . One solution is given in Chen and Rashed (1998a) by:

(30) |

where is Euler’s constant.

**4.3. Higher-order Spline**

Here, we want to obtain the particular solutions for the higher-order Spline, i.e defined as follows:

(31) |

(32) |

To calculate the particular solution for , we have to solve and , therefore . It is easily shown that the solution to is (Golberg et al. ^{[7]}):

(33) |

And for :

(34) |

To obtain solutions, which are regular at , we use the Taylor series expansions of and at , and comparing coefficients gives:

(35) |

A similar argument for gives:

(36) |

The results for different orders are given in Table 1 and Table 2.

Finally, the flowchart algorithm of the DRBEM is shown in Figure 1. First, geometry of the body is modeled. DRBEM method defines some internal and boundary nodes. Using RBF, the domain integral can be inverted to the boundary integral. This is the main advantage of DRM to deal with boundary of the body.

**Figure**

**1**

*Flowchart algorithm of the DRBEM*

**.**### 5. Numerical Results

The geometry of problems is a Square with side of unit length. These examples are chosen since their analytical solutions can be obtained. More complex problems can be handled in the same DRM fashion without any extra difficulty.

The inhomogeneous 2D Helmholtz problem is governed by equation:

(37) |

(38) |

The analytical solution is:

(39) |

The Dirichlet boundary conditions can be determined from the exact solution (39).

**5.1. Without Polynomial Terms**

For all different RBF in Table 3, the solution is obtained using 200 boundary elements (50 on each side) and 25 internal nodes.

As it is seen, the result of *1+r* without polynomial term is more accurate, while the results of TPS and poly-harmonic Splines of order 2 without polynomial terms are so bad.

**5.2. With Polynomial Terms**

To obtain a more accurate answer, polynomial terms have been added to radial basis functions:

(40) |

where is obtained from the following equation:

(41) |

where can be any polynomial function. Some of the functions p and are given in Table 4.

Results for some points, are compared in Table 5 by applying polynomial term, where is a polynomial of total degree *n*.

Advanced classical RBF shown in Table 5, is obtained from contrariwise method. In this method at first we choice any particular solutions , for example , then with solving this equation , as a result, the advanced classical radial basis function (*acrbf*) is obtained.

(42) |

According to Table 5, it’s seen that the result from this method is very accurate, but it’s so difficult to guessing a particular solution that gives an exact answer.

Finally, we compared the relative error (RE) with various RBFs, as shown in Figure 2. Although for all cases the RE is less that 0.03%, but for acrbf is very small error.

### 6. Conclusions

In this paper, a DRBEM formulation for axisymmetric Helmholtz-type equation is briefly presented. We have generalized pervious work using TPS for finding particular solutions to Helmholtz-type operators by using higher-order Splines, substantially increased accuracy can be obtained using higher Splines. Based on this research, following conclusions can be drawn:

• Higher accuracy can be obtained by using higher-order Splines with polynomial term. Acrbf is much better than others.

• The polynomial terms of RBF are important as shown in Table 3 and Table 5.

• With annihilator approach, we can obtain particular solutions of any order of TPS in 2D and 3D. Table 1 and Table 2 shows the particular solutions of 3D Helmholtz-type equation and Table 4 shows the particular solutions of 2D polynomials terms for* *.

Numerical examples for Helmholtz-type equation using higher-order Splines in 3D will be examined and compare with lower order Splines in the next research, and that will be our future plan.

**Figure**

**2**

**.***Relative error using various RBFs*

### References

[1] | Pozrikidis, C., A Partial Guide to Boundary Element Method, Boca Raton London New York Washington, D.C. | ||

In article | |||

[2] | Chandler, S., Langdon, W&S. Boundary element methods for acoustics, Department of mathematics, 2007. | ||

In article | |||

[3] | Nardini, D. and Brebbia, C.A., New Approach to Vibration Analysis Using Boundary Elements, in Boundary Element Methods in Engineering, Computational Mechanics Publications 1982, Southampton and Springer-Verlag, Berlin. | ||

In article | View Article | ||

[4] | Partridge, P.W., Brebbia, C.A. and Wrobel, L., the Dual Reciprocity Boundary Element Method, Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton and Elsevier Applied Science, London & New York, 1992. | ||

In article | |||

[5] | Golberg M.A. & Chen C.S., Discrete Projection Methods for Integral Equations Southampton: Computational Mechanics Publications, 1997. | ||

In article | PubMed | ||

[6] | Zapletal, J., The Boundary element method for the Helmholtz Equation in 3D, Department of Applied Mathematics, 2012. | ||

In article | |||

[7] | Wen, Li. & Ming, Li. & Chen, C.S. &Xiaofeng, Liu., Compactly supported radial basis functions for solving certain high-order partial differential equations in 3D, 2014. | ||

In article | |||

[8] | Golberg, M.A. & Chen, C.S., The theory of radial basis functions applied to the BEM for inhomogeneous partial differential equations, Boundary Elements Communications, 1994, 5(2), 5761. | ||

In article | |||

[9] | Lai, S.J. & Wang, B.Z., Solving Helmholtz Equation by Meshless Radial Basis Functions Method, 2010. | ||

In article | |||

[10] | Qiu, Z.H., Wrobel, L.C. & Power, H., An evaluation of boundary Elements XV, Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, 1993. | ||

In article | |||

[11] | Popov, V. & Power, H., A domain decomposition in the dual reciprocity approach, Boundary Elements Communications, 7(1), pp. 1-5, 1996. | ||

In article | |||

[12] | Muleshkov, A.S. &Golberg, M.A. & Chen, C.S., particular solutions for axisymmetric Helmholtz-type operators, 2005. | ||

In article | |||

[13] | Zhu, S., Particular solutions associated with the Helmholtz operator used in DRBEM, BE Abstracts, 4(6), pp. 231-233, 1993. | ||

In article | |||

[14] | Zhen-Lin Ji Xue-ren Wang, Application of dual reciprocity boundary element method to predict acoustic attenuation characteristics of marine engine, exhaust silencers, Journal Marine Science Application, Vol. 7, 2008, pp102-110. | ||

In article | View Article | ||

[15] | Chen, C.S. & Brebbia, C.A, The dual reciprocity method for Helmholtz type operators, Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Nevada, NV 89154, USA, 1998. | ||

In article | |||

[16] | Ramachandran, P.A., Boundary Element Methods in Transport Phenomena, Elsevier Applied Science, 1994. | ||

In article | |||

[17] | Chen CS, Rashed YF. Evolution of thin plate Spline based particular solutions for Helmholtz-type equation for the DRM. Mechanical and Research Communication 1998; 25(2), pp195-201. | ||

In article | View Article | ||

[18] | Perrey-Debaine. Analysis of convergence and accuracy of the DRBEM for axisymmetric Helmholtz-type equation, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 1999, Vol. 23, pp703-711. | ||

In article | View Article | ||

[19] | Muleshkov, A.S. &Golberg, M.A. & Chen, C.S., Particular Solution of Helmholtz-type Operators Using Higher-Order Poly harmonic Splines, 1999. | ||

In article | |||

[20] | Derrick WR, Grossman SI: Elementary Differential Equations with Applications. Addison-Wessley Publishing Co, 1976. | ||

In article | |||

[21] | Golberg, M.A. & Chen CS, Rashed YF., the annihilator method for computing particular solutions to partial differential equations, to appear in Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem, 1998a. | ||

In article | |||