Weak Solutions for a Class of (p,q) Laplacian quasilinear Elliptic System with Different Weights
Tahar Bouali1,
, Rafik Guefaifiai1
1Department of Mathematics, University Tebessa, Algeria
Abstract
Using variational methods, we study the existence of weak solutions for the degenerate quasilinear elliptic system
where
is a smooth bounded domain,
stands for the gradient of
-function
the weights
are allowed to vanish somewhere, the primitive
is intimately related to the first eigenvalue of a corresponding quasilinear system
Keywords: quasilinear elliptic system, Palais-Smale condition, mountain pass theorem, existence
International Journal of Partial Differential Equations and Applications, 2014 2 (5),
pp 86-90.
DOI: 10.12691/ijpdea-2-5-1
Received March 30, 2014; Revised November 09, 2014; Accepted November 16, 2014
Copyright © 2013 Science and Education Publishing. All Rights Reserved.Cite this article:
- Bouali, Tahar, and Rafik Guefaifiai. "Weak Solutions for a Class of (p,q) Laplacian quasilinear Elliptic System with Different Weights." International Journal of Partial Differential Equations and Applications 2.5 (2014): 86-90.
- Bouali, T. , & Guefaifiai, R. (2014). Weak Solutions for a Class of (p,q) Laplacian quasilinear Elliptic System with Different Weights. International Journal of Partial Differential Equations and Applications, 2(5), 86-90.
- Bouali, Tahar, and Rafik Guefaifiai. "Weak Solutions for a Class of (p,q) Laplacian quasilinear Elliptic System with Different Weights." International Journal of Partial Differential Equations and Applications 2, no. 5 (2014): 86-90.
| Import into BibTeX | Import into EndNote | Import into RefMan | Import into RefWorks |
1. Introduction
In this paper, we are concerned with the quasilinear elliptic system
![]() | (1.1) |
where
is a smooth bounded domain in
,
nonnegative real number,
stands for the gradient of
in the variable
. We point out that in the case,
problem (1:1) has been studied in many papers. For more details about this kind of systems, we refer to [4, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 19], in which the authors used various methods to get the existence of solutions. The degeneracy of this system is considered in the sense that the measurable, non-negative diffusion coefficients
,
are allowed to vanish in
(as well as at the boundary
) and/or to blow up in
. The point of departure for the consideration of suitable assumptions on the diffusion coefficients
Let us introduce the function space
which consists of functions
such that
and
for some
satisfying
Then for the weight functions
we assume the following hypothesis:
There exist functions
in the space
for some
and
in the space
, for some
, such that
![]() | (1.2) |
a.e. in
for some constants 
We consider the weighted Sobolev spaces
and
to be defined as the closures of
with respect to the norms
![]() |
and set
It is clear that
is a reflexive Banach space under the norm
![]() |
For more details about the space setting we refer to [10] and the references therein. The key in our arguments is the following lemma
Lemma 1.1 (see [10]). Assume that
is a bounded domain in
and the weight
satisfies
Then the following embedding hold:
(i)
continuously for
where 
(ii)
compactly for any 
In the sequel we denote by the
and
the quantities
and
respectively, where
and
are induced by condition the
. The assumptions concerning the coefficient functions of (1.1) are the following:
(A)
and either there exists
of positive Lebesgue measure, i.e,
such that
for all
neither
in 
(D)
and either there exists
of positive Lebesgue measure, i.e,
such that
for all
neither
in 
(B)
a.e, in
and
where 
Many authors studied the existence of solutions for such problems (equations or systems) ;see for example [5, 6, 11, 15, 16, 18, 19].
Recently in [7], the authors considered the system
![]() |
They are concerned with the nonexistence and multiplicity of nonnegative, nontrivial solutions.
Also, we mention some results concerning the associated eigenvalue problem. Let
be the first eigenvalue of the Diruchlet porblem
![]() | (1.3) |
where the functions
and
satisfy
and the exponents
satisfy
![]() | (1.4) |
then, we have that
is a positive number, which is characterized variationally by
![]() | (1.5) |
Moreover,
is isolated, the associated eigenfunction
is componentwise nonnegative and
is the only eigenvalue of (1:2) to which corresponds a componentwise nonnegative eigenfunction. In addition, the set of all eigenfunctions corresponding to the principal eigenvalue
forms a one-dimentional manifold
which is defined by
![]() |
In the rest of this article, the following assumption is required.
![]() | (1.6) |
The aim of this work is to extend or complete some of the above results for system (1.1). Our assumptions are as follows:
are
-fonction satisfying the hypotheses below:
(F.1) There exist positive constants
such that
![]() |
with
![]() |
(F.2) There exist
and
such that
![]() |
(F.3) There exists positive constant
such that
![]() |
Next, we introduce the functionals 
![]() |
Lemma 1.2. The functionals I, J, are well defined. Moreover, I is continuous and J are compact.
We say that
is a weak solution of problem (1.1) if
is a critical point of the functionals
![]() |
![]() |
The main results of this paper are the following two theorems.
2. Proof of the Main Result
Theorem 2.1. 2.1. Let (F.1) hold, such that (1.4) satisfait, then there exist
such that system (1.1) possesses a weak solution for all 
Lemma 2.2. 2.2. Let
be a sequence weakly converging to
in
There we have
(i) 
(ii) 
Proof. (i) Let
be a sequence that converges weakly to
By the weak lower semicontinuity of the norm in the space
and
we deduce that
![]() |
The compactness of operator J, by lemma 2.2, imply the conclusion.
Lemma 2.3. 2.3. The functional
is coercive and bounded from below.
Proof. By (F.1) there exists
such that for all
and
we deduce that
![]() |
Applying Young’s inequality, we obtain
![]() | (2.1) |
where
are the embedding constants of
and 
Consequently
![]() |
Tayking
such that
for all
it follows that for
is coercive, indeed
as
.
Proof of theorem 2.1 The coerciveness of
and the weak sequential lower semi continuity are enough in order to prove that
attaints its infimum, so the system (1.1) has at least one weak solution.
Lemma 2.4. Let
be a bounded sequence in
such that
is bounded and
as
Then
has a convergent subsequence.
Theorem 2.4. 2.5. In addition to (F.2) and (F.3), then there exist
such that system (1.1) possesses a weak nontrivial solution for all 
Proof. To prove the existence of a weak nontrivial solution we apply a version of the Mountain Pass theorem due to Ambrosetti and Rabinowitz [1]. For this purpose we verify that
satisfies:
(i) the mountain pass type geometry,
(ii) the
condition.
(i) d’apres
![]() |
Hence, there exists r > 0, small enough, such that
![]() |
On the other hand by using (1.4), we have
![]() |
Thus, we conclude that ther exists
large enough, such that for
we have
and 
(ii) According to Lemma (2.4), it is sufficient to prove that the sequence
is bounded in 
Let
be such a
sequence, that is,
and
as
We obtain
![]() |
which shows from (F.2) that
![]() | (2.2) |
Next, we use the following interpolation inequality: let
and suppose that for some measurable function
we have that
![]() |
Then
![]() | (2.3) |
We use (2.3) for
and
we get
![]() | (2.4) |
![]() | (2.5) |
Using (2.2), we obtain
![]() | (2.6) |
and
![]() | (2.7) |
By Lemma 1.1, it follows that
![]() | (2.8) |
and
![]() | (2.9) |
where
and
On the other hand, by (F.2) and (2.4) -(2.9),we get
![]() |
Since
is bounded and
it follows that
is bounded in
By Lemma 2:4, we obtain that the functional
satisfies the
condition (compactness condition).
The assumptions of the mountain pass theorem in [3] are satisfied. Then the functional
admits a nontrivial critical point in W and thus system (1.1) has a nontrivial weak solution. The proof of Theorem 2.1 is complete.
References
| [1] | G.A. Afrouzi, S. Mahdavi and Nikolaos B. Zographopoulos, Existence of solutions for non-uniformly nonlinear elliptic systems, Electron. J. Diff. Equ., 167(2011), 1-9. | ||
In article | |||
| [2] | G.A. Afrouzi and S. Mahdavi, Existence results for a class of degenerate quasilinear elliptic systems, Lithuanian Math. J., 51 (2011), 451-460. | ||
In article | CrossRef | ||
| [3] | A. Ambrosetti and P.H. Rabinowitz, Dual variational methods in critical points theory and applications, J. Funct. Anal., 4 (1973), 349-381. | ||
In article | CrossRef | ||
| [4] | L. Boccardo and D.G. De Figueiredo, Some remarks on a system of quasilinear elliptic equations, Nonlinear Diff. Equ. Appl. (NoDEA), 9 (2002), 309-323. | ||
In article | CrossRef | ||
| [5] | P. Caldiroli and R. Musina, On a variational degenerate elliptic problem, Nonlinear Di¤. Equ. Appl. (NoDEA), 7 (2000), 187-199. | ||
In article | CrossRef | ||
| [6] | N.T. Chung, Existence of in nitely many solutions for degenerate and singular elliptic systems with inde nite concave nonlinearities, Electron. J. Diff. Equ., 30 (2011), 1-12. | ||
In article | |||
| [7] | N.T. Chung and H.Q. Toan, On a class of degenerate and singular elliptic systems in bounded domain, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 360 (2009), 422-431. | ||
In article | CrossRef | ||
| [8] | D.G.Costa, On a class of elliptic systems in , Electron. J. Diff. Equ., 7(1994), 1-14. | ||
In article | |||
| [9] | A. Djellit and S. Tas, Existence of solutions for a class of elliptic systems in involving the p-Laplacian, Electron. J. Diff. Equ., 56 (2003), 1-8. | ||
In article | |||
| [10] | P. Drabek, A. Kufner and F. Nicolosi, Quasilinear elliptic equations with degeneration and singularities, Walter de Gruyter and Co., Berlin, 1997. | ||
In article | CrossRef | ||
| [11] | D.D. Hai and R. Shivaji, An existence result on positive solutions of p-Laplacian systems, Nonlinear Anal., 56 (2004), 1007-1010. | ||
In article | CrossRef | ||
| [12] | D.W. Huang and Y.Q. Li, Multiplicity of solutions for a noncooperative p-Laplacian elliptic system in , J. Differential Equations, 215 (2005), 206-223. | ||
In article | CrossRef | ||
| [13] | S. Ma, Nontrivial solutions for resonant cooperative elliptic systems via computations of the critical groups, Nonlinear Analysis, 73 (2010), 3856-3872. | ||
In article | CrossRef | ||
| [14] | J.M.B. do O, Solutions to perturbed eigenvalue problems of the p-Laplacian in , Electron. J. Diff. Equ., 11 (1997), 1-15. | ||
In article | |||
| [15] | T.F. Wu, The Nehari manifold for a semilinear elliptic system involving sign changing weight functions, Nonlinear Analysis, 68 (2008), 1733-1745. | ||
In article | CrossRef | ||
| [16] | G. Zhang and Y. Wang, Some existence results for a class of degenerate semilinear elliptic systems, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 333 (2007), 904-918. | ||
In article | CrossRef | ||
| [17] | N.B. Zographopoulos, On the principal eigenvalue of degenerate quasilinear elliptic systems, Math. Nachr., 281 (2008), No. 9,1351-1365. | ||
In article | |||
| [18] | N.B. Zographopoulos, On a class of degenarate potential elliptic system, Nonlinear Diff. Equ. Appl. (NoDEA), 11 (2004), 191-199. | ||
In article | |||
| [19] | N.B. Zographopoulos, p-Laplacian systems on resonance, Appl. Anal., 83 (2004), 509-519. | ||
In article | CrossRef | ||
OPEN ACCESS
PEER-REVIEWED



































In article
, Electron. J. Diff. Equ., 7(1994), 1-14.
involving the p-Laplacian, Electron. J. Diff. Equ., 56 (2003), 1-8.
, J. Differential Equations, 215 (2005), 206-223.
, Electron. J. Diff. Equ., 11 (1997), 1-15.
CiteULike
Delicious

