A 3D Brans-Dicke Theory Model

T. G. do Prado, E. F. Reis, M. C. Vergės, V. Piccirillo, J. R. Ciappina

International Journal of Physics

A 3D Brans-Dicke Theory Model

T. G. do Prado1,, E. F. Reis1, M. C. Vergės1, V. Piccirillo1, J. R. Ciappina1

1Federal University of Technology-Paraná, Departament of Mathematics 84016-210, Ponta Grossa, PR, Brasil

Abstract

The evidence of an accelerated universe and the gap of 70 percent in the total energy, collected by WMAP, are problems that cannot be solved by standard models based on General relativity. Therefore the search for an alternative theory that solves the open questions in General Relativity became an important research field in the past few years. A particular alternative is the Brans-Dicke theory, which has been broadly studied as concerned to k-essence type fields in 4D. However, this theory is almost unexplored in the context of the dimensional reduction in 3D. In the present work, we study the Brans-Dicke Theory in a dimensional reduction context. In order to do this, we consider the Brans-Dicke theory in the vacuum, and in the presence of matter fields.

Cite this article:

  • T. G. do Prado, E. F. Reis, M. C. Vergės, V. Piccirillo, J. R. Ciappina. A 3D Brans-Dicke Theory Model. International Journal of Physics. Vol. 4, No. 3, 2016, pp 64-68. http://pubs.sciepub.com/ijp/4/3/4
  • Prado, T. G. do, et al. "A 3D Brans-Dicke Theory Model." International Journal of Physics 4.3 (2016): 64-68.
  • Prado, T. G. D. , Reis, E. F. , Vergės, M. C. , Piccirillo, V. , & Ciappina, J. R. (2016). A 3D Brans-Dicke Theory Model. International Journal of Physics, 4(3), 64-68.
  • Prado, T. G. do, E. F. Reis, M. C. Vergės, V. Piccirillo, and J. R. Ciappina. "A 3D Brans-Dicke Theory Model." International Journal of Physics 4, no. 3 (2016): 64-68.

Import into BibTeX Import into EndNote Import into RefMan Import into RefWorks

At a glance: Figures

1. Introduction

The evidence of an accelerated expansion of the universe, observed by WMAP [3], opened the discussion of the general relativity eventual limits. There are many options for alternative theories of gravity, and among them we can cite scalar-tensor theories like supergravity, Kaluza-Klein theories, dual string theories, M-Theory, etc [1, 2, 4, 5, 14]. One particular kind of scalar-tensor theory to describe an accelerate expansion of the universe, called Brans-Dicke theory [6, 7], was proposed in the early sixties . This theory uses the principle of Mach and the hypothesis of Dirac [8], considering an eventual variation in time of the Newton’s gravitational constant, thus ensuring the universality of free fall (equivalence principle) [20, 22, 23].

Most of the works which have been published in this theory up to now consider four flat dimensions, and some of them have tried to associate the scalar field of the Brans-Dicke theory as quintessence field [9], ΛC DM models [19] and as a type of K-essence field [10, 18]. Others have tried to find a solution for the observed accelerated expansion using a dimensional reduction of the 5D Brans-Dicke theory without matter [11, 12].

Concerning three dimensions, a broad study has been done in gravitational theories since the publication of [13], motivated by the fact that 3D theories avoid some complications found in higher dimensions [15, 16]. However, there are not as many results about 3D scalartensor theories, and it would be interesting to find some results in this subject, more specifically in 3D Brans-Dicke theory. For instance, we can see some problems like the association of the scalar field of the Brans-Dicke theory to K-essence fields which models the dark energy, as done in [10]. The goal in this paper is to construct and then analyze the behavior of a 3D Brans-Dicke model. For this we consider a Brans-Dicke scalar field which depends only on the cosmic time.

2. The 3D Brans-Dicke Theory

The action of Brans-Dicke theory in 3D will be described by [5]

(1)

where R is the scalar curvature associated to the 3D metric is the scalar FIeld of the Brans-Dicke theory, is a theory dimensionless parameter, and represents the lagrangian of the matter. The matter FIelds do not depend on the scalar field (this is necessary in order to preserve the weak equivalence principle [5]). Note that, in 3D, the field has dimensions of inverse length.

The equations for the gravitational field derived from (1), can be written in the following form

(2)

where and is the energy momentum tensor associated with the matter fields for 3D. From the equation (1) it is possible to find that the field equation for the scalar field is given by

(3)

where is the trace of energy momentum tensor. In the context of a perfect fluid approximation, it can be seen from the second term in the equation (2) as the energy momentum tensor associated with the BD scalar field , and write

(4)

We consider a perfect fluid approximation for the matter fields. Then the energy momentum tensor associated with matter field will be given by

(5)

where p and represent the pressure and energy density associated with the matter-fluid and is the velocity vector. The pressure and energy density are related by the state equation where is a parameter of proportionality. Comparing this relation with equation (3) we see that the BD scalar field and this matter-fluid are related by

(6)

As the BD scalar field has non-minimal coupling with gravity, it is impossible to write an expression similar to the equation (5), relating the associated pressure and energy density for the field these quantities being identified as the spatial and temporal components of the energy momentum tensor associated with the BD scalar field, given by the equation (4). However, they are related by the equation of state

3. 3D Brans-Dicke Cosmology in the Absence of Matter

Let the spacetime be described by the 3D FRLW metric, that is given by [5]

(7)

where is a dimensionless cosmic scale factor, and k is a parameter which can assume only one of three values: −1 (open universe), 0 (at universe) and +1 (closed universe). The observations done by WMAP, show that for 4D standard model the universe is about at. Then following this tendency, we will consider only the at case for the 3D model. Replacing (7) and in (2); we find that the pressure and the energy density associated with the BD scalar field are given by

(8)
(9)

If the BD scalar field is assumed as a perfect fluid, then the equations (8) and (9) are complemented by the equation of state [5, 24, 25]

(10)

Considering the at metric from (7) in the equations (2) and (6) we find

(11)

In order to solve this system of coupled equations, we consider the ansatz

(12)

where G0 denotes the present value for the Newton's gravitational constant and is a dimensionless parameter. Using the equation (12) in (11) we get a condition that relates the to n parameters, namely

(13)

Now, substitution of the ansatz in (10) results

that implies in two possibilities for the parameter n

The only acceptable possibility for the n parameter is , resulting in because the value results in a divergent parameter without a physical meaning. For this value of the Brans-Dicke scalar field is given by and the scale factor, has the form

(14)

Thus, when we consider depending only on time, the 3D Brans-Dicke model reduces exactly to the results of the 3D general relativity model. Therefore for a massless universe, the 3D Brans-Dicke theory does not have any K-essence behavior.

4. 3D Brans-Dicke Cosmology in the Presence of Matter

In this section we address the cosmology problem derived from the 3D Brans-Dicke theory in the presence of matter for a at background. As can be seen in Section II, the matter will be modeled like a perfect fluid with associated energy density and pressure Substituting the FRLW metric (7) in the field equations (2), we see that the resulting Friedmann equations, in this case, are given by

(15)
(16)

The energy density and the pressure p are related by

Thus the equation (16) can be rewritten as

(17)

If we require the conservation of the energy momentum tensor, then we see that the equations of state for the matter fields and for the BD scalar field are given by

(18)
(19)

The non-minimal coupling between the BD scalar field and gravity in the equation (1) amounts to a mixed term in the equation of state for involving the matter density which makes its solution a non-trivial one. Also, we see that, since the BD scalar field is massless and does not interact with matter, the equation (18) preserves the weak equivalence principle. And, by integrating equation (18), we obtain that the energy density is related to the scale factor by means of

As in the previous section, now we propose the ansatz

(20)

as solutions for the equations (15) and (17), where is a constant. Replacing this ansatz in the coupled field equations (15) and (17) gives us the results

(21)

Unlike the scalar-vaccum configuration, now it is not possible to determine the parameter ; since the state equation (19) is coupled. The equation (21) shows that there are two possibilities for , but for small values of the positive value of allows a negative value for the energy density, which is forbidden by the strong energy condition [17]. Therefore the negative choice is the only possibility for

If we replace the ansatz (20) in the general equations (8) and (9) we find that the equations for the energy density and pressure associated with the BD scalar field are given by

(22)
(23)

and the Brans-Dicke energy density and pressure are related by

If the strong energy condition [17] is considered, we find that the deceleration parameter for the 3D model constructed with the Brans-Dicke theory, is given by

(24)

where

and H is the Hubble parameter. We observe that the first term in the right side is related to the matter fields, while the second term is related to the BD scalar field.

The behavior of the 3D Brans-Dicke model as a Kessence theory, depends on the possible values for the dimensionless parameter of theory, parameter that relates the Brans-Dicke energy density and pressure, and the parameter that relates the energy density and pressure of matter fields. For this last parameter, there are two possibilities: that describes a Matter Dominate Era (MDE); Radiation Dominate Era (RDE).

For the RDE, the 3D Brans Dicke theory recovers the cosmological standard model results. For the MDE the behavior of the parameter is described by Figure 1.

Figure 1. parameter in terms of dimensionless parameter of theory

Analyzing Figure 1, we found that has negative values for However, the Brans-Dicke Theory is inconsistent for small values of the dimensionless parameter in a solar system level, this consistence is restored only for larger values of [5]. For large values of does not assume positive values, which is inconsistent with the description of an accelerated expansion of a 3D universe.

A comparison between the scale factors of the 3D and 4D Brans-Dicke models is shown in Figure 2. As expected, the models have a different behavior as presented in [10]. Figure 2 shows that there is a value of time that the two models converge to the same result, diverging again shortly thereafter.

Figure 2. Comparison between scale factor a(t) behavior for vacuum of 3D (red) and 4D (green) models

For the MDE, the energy density of Brans-Dicke scalar field is non null. This is expected because the Brans-Dicke scalar field is generated by matter fields (3). The analysis of Figure 1 shows that the Brans-Dicke model can only describe a K-essence field for some values of the dimensionless parameter However for the consistency of the theory, only larger values of are allowed in a solar system level [5, 21]; and for the 3D theory no describe a K-essence model In the RDE the 3D and 4D models has the same behaviour. The 3D Brans-Dicke model restores the General Relativity results when

Table 1. 3D and 4D Brans-Dicke models

Table 1 shows a comparation between the scale factor behavior of 3D and 4D Brans-Dicke models for the different evolution eras. An interesting result is that there is no difference between vacuum Era and RDE in the 3D Brans-Dicke model. Therefore, the 3D model has only two distinct evolution Eras, while the 4D Brans-Dicke model has four distinct Eras (see Table 1) [10]. This comparison shows that for the scalar tensor theories like Brans-Dicke theory, the choice of spatial dimension is a very important factor for the theory behavior.

5. Conclusions

In the absence of matter fields (vacuum), the energy density of the Brans-Dicke scalar field vanishes, i.e. and the 3D Brans-Dicke theory recovers the 3D General Relativity results. This result is expected since the Brans-Dicke scalar field is generated by matter fields (3). However the 4D Brans-Dicke model does not reduce to the 4D General Relativity model when the matter fields vanish [10], and a new Era of scalar field emerges in the 4D Brans-Dicke model. This new Era in the 4D model is due to K-essence behavior of Brans-Dicke scalar field in 4D model, which does not happen in the 3D model.

In the presence of matter fields, the energy density of the 3D scalar fields is non-null. However, even in the presence of matter fields, the 3D Brans-Dick model does not have a K-essence behavior like found in the 4D model [10]. Another important information is that 3D Brans-Dicke model has only two distinct evolution Eras, the vacuum and RDE Eras are the same and the MDE Era. In this sense we conclude that the difference of scale factor behavior between 3D and 4D Brans-Dicke models is mainly due to the dimensional factor of the field equations.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank CNPq and CAPES for financial support and the Professor Rodrigo Frehse Pereira for the support with the text editor.

References

[1]  E. Berti. Astrophysical Black Holes as Natural Laboratories for Fundamental Physics and Strong-Field Gravity. Braz. J. Phys., 43:341-350, 2013.
In article      View Article
 
[2]  J. C. Fabris, F. T. Falciano, J. Marto, N. Pinto-Neto, P. Vargas Moniz. Dilaton Quantum Cosmology with a Schrdinger-like Equation. Braz. J. Phys., 42:475-481, 2012.
In article      View Article
 
[3]  D. N. Spergel et al. First year Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) observations: determination of cosmological parameters. Astrophys. J., 148:175, 2003. (arXiv:astro-ph/0302209).
In article      View Article
 
[4]  P. Jordan. Schwerkraft undWeltall. Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn, Braunschweig, 1955.
In article      
 
[5]  Y. Fujii, K. Maeda. The scalar-tensor theory of gravitation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004.
In article      View Article
 
[6]  C. Brans, R. H. Dicke. Mach's principle and a relativistic theory of gravitation. Phys. Rev., 124:925, 1961.
In article      View Article
 
[7]  R. H. Dicke. Mach's principle and invariance under transformation of units. Phys. Rev., 125:2163, 1962.
In article      View Article
 
[8]  P. A. M. Dirac. New basis for cosmology. Proc. Roy. Soc., A165:199, 1938.
In article      View Article
 
[9]  N. Banerjee, D. Pavon. A Quintessence scalar field in Brans-Dicke theory. Class. Quant. Grav., 18:593, 2001.
In article      View Article
 
[10]  H. Kim. Brans-Dicke scalar field as a unique k-essence. Phys. Lett., B606:223, 2005.
In article      View Article
 
[11]  L. Qiang, Y. Ma, M. Han, D. Yu. Five-dimensional Brans-Dicke theory and cosmic acceleration. Phys. Rev., D71:061501, 2005.
In article      View Article
 
[12]  J. Ponce de Leon. Late time cosmic acceleration from vacuum Dicke theory in 5D. Class. Quantum Grav., 27:095002, 2010.
In article      View Article
 
[13]  M. Ba~nados, C. Teitelboim, J. Zanelli. Black hole in three-dimensional spacetime. Phys. Rev. Lett., 69:1849, 1992.
In article      View Article  PubMed
 
[14]  O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, Y. Oz. Large N Field Theories, String Theory and Gravity. Phys. Reports, 323:183, 2000.
In article      View Article
 
[15]  A. Maloney, W. Song, A. Strominger. Chiral gravity, log gravity and extremal CFT. Phys. Rev., D81:064007, 2010.
In article      View Article
 
[16]  A. A. Bytsenko and M. E. X. Guimarães. Truncated heat kernel and one-loop determinants for the BTZ geometry. Eur. Phys. J. C., 58:511, 2008.
In article      View Article
 
[17]  S. W. Hawking, G. F. R. Ellis. The large structure of space-time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1973.
In article      View Article
 
[18]  E. Nabulsi, A. Rami. Effective cosmology a la Brans-Dicke with a non-minimally coupling massive inaton field interacting with minimally coupling massless field. Braz. J. Phys., 40(3):273, 2010.
In article      
 
[19]  D. A. Tretyakova, A. A. Shatskiy, I. D. Novikov, S. Alexeyev. Nonsingular Brans-Dicke ˄ cosmology. Phys. Rev., D85:124059, 2012.
In article      View Article
 
[20]  S. V. Sushkov, S. M. Kozyrev. Composite vacuum Brans-Dicke wormholes. Phys. Rev., D84:124026, 2011.
In article      View Article
 
[21]  K. H. Saaidi, A. Mohammadi, H. Sheikhahmadi. parameter and Solar System constraint in chameleon-Brans-Dicke theory. Phys. Rev., D83:104019, 2011.
In article      View Article
 
[22]  Feng-Quan Wu and Xuelei Chen. Cosmic microwave background with Brans-Dicke gravity. II. Constraints with the WMAP and SDSS data. Phys. Rev., D82:083003, 2010.
In article      View Article
 
[23]  Feng-QuanWu, Li-e Qiang, XinWang, Xuelei Chen. Cosmic microwave background with Brans-Dicke gravity. I. Covariant Formulation. Phys. Rev., D82:083002, 2010.
In article      View Article
 
[24]  S. Weinberg. Gravitation and Cosmology. Wiley, Barbacena, 1972.
In article      
 
[25]  C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, J. A. Wheeler. Gravitation. W. H. Freeman and Company, 1973.
In article      
 
  • CiteULikeCiteULike
  • MendeleyMendeley
  • StumbleUponStumbleUpon
  • Add to DeliciousDelicious
  • FacebookFacebook
  • TwitterTwitter
  • LinkedInLinkedIn