1Registrar in Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
2Department of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
3Ministry of Health, Sri Lanka
4Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
The mandibular first molar (MFM) is considered a vital tooth in establishing occlusion in the permanent dentition. As it is a tooth prone to caries its morphology is vital in restorative, endodontic and surgical aspects in dentistry. Accurate working length (WL) determination is considered an essential for the success of root canal therapy. Methods of WL estimation include detecting the apical constriction by tactile means (apical boundness), using a periapical radiograph or by means of an electronic apex locator (EAL). The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of different WL assessment methods in comparison to the actual length of the tooth assessed by visualising the apical constriction of MFMs. Access cavities were prepared in 188 extracted permanent MFMs, mounted on alginate and suitable K-file was passed though each root canal to determine the apical constriction. WL was determined with a third generation apex locator with a proven accuracy (Root ZX Mini J Moritacorp. Japan). These teeth were assessed both with analog and digital radiography to assess the position of the files on the radiograph. Finally the teeth were assessed with a 2.5X magnification to visually locate the apical constriction (actual length) of each root canal. The mean actual length of mesio-buccal canal was 20.06mm, mesio-lingual canal was 19.97 mm, disto buccal canal was 19.81 mm and disto- lingual canal was 19.40 mm. Accuracy of EAL is 98.5%. There was no significant difference between the accuracies of 1st bound, film based and digital radiography. Thus the most accurate method in WL determination is the EAL.
| [1] | Pitt Ford TR. Endodontics in Clinical Practice, 5th Edition, Wright Publications 2004; 62-64 & 82-85. |
| [2] | Bernardes RA, Duarte MA, Vasconcelos BC, Moraes IG, Bernardineli N, Garcia RB, Baldi JV, Victorino FR, Bramante CM. Evaluation of precision of length determination with 3 electronic apex locators: Root ZX, Elements Diagnostic Unit and Apex Locator and RomiAPEX -30. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology Endodontology. 2007; Oct; 104(4):e91-4.View Article PubMed |
| [3] | Ingle J, Bakland L, Buchanan S et al. Endodontic cavity preparation. Ingle J. Bakland L, 4th Edition. Endodontics. Malvarn, Philadelphia: Williams and Wilkins 1994; 92-227. PubMed |
| [4] | Ingle J, Bakland L, Buchanan S et al. Endodontic cavity preparation. Ingle J. Bakland L, 5th Edition. Endodontics. Hamilton, OPntario: BC Decker 2002; 517-525. PubMed |
| [5] | Gordon MPJ and Chandler NP Electronic Apex Locators. International endodontic journal, 2004; 37(7), 425-437.View Article PubMed |
| [6] | Kaufman AY, Keila S, Yoshpe M Accuracy of a new apex locator: an in vitro study. International Endodontic Journal 2002; 35, 186-192.View Article PubMed |
| [7] | Venturi M and Breschi L A comparison between two electronic apex locators: an in vivo investigation. International endodontic journal, 2007; May; 40(5) : 362-73.View Article PubMed |
| [8] | Cunha DA et al D'Assunção FL, de Albuquerque DS, de Queiroz Ferreira LC. The ability of two Apex locators to locate the apical foramen: An In vitro Study. Journal of Endodontics, 2006; 32(6) : 560-562.View Article PubMed |
| [9] | Horner, K., A.C. Shearer, A. Walker and N.H. Wilson, Radiovisography: An initial evaluation. Br. Dent. J.1990; 168: 244-248.View Article PubMed |
| [10] | White, S.C. and M.J. Pharaoh. Oral Radiology: Principle and Interpretation. 5th Edn., Mosby, St Louis, MO USA. 2004; 560. PubMed |
| [11] | Shearer, A.C., K. Horner and N.H. Wilson. Radiovisiography for length estimation in root canal treatment: An in vitro comparison with conventional radiography. International Endodntic Journal.1991; 24: 233-239. PubMed |
| [12] | Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology 1984; 58, 589-99.View Article |
| [13] | Tratman EK. A comparison of the teeth of people Indo-European racial stock with mongaloid racial stock. Dental Record 1950; 70, 31-53. |
| [14] | Walker RT, Quackenbush LE. Three-rooted lower first permanent molars in Hong Kong Chinese. British Dental Journal. 1985; 159, 298-9.View Article PubMed |
| [15] | Gulabivala K, Aung TH, Alawi A, Ng YL. Root and Canal morphology of Burmese mandibulart molars. International Endodontic Journal. 2001; 34(5): 359-70.View Article PubMed |
| [16] | Jayasinghe RD, Li TK. Three-rooted first permanent mandibular molars in a Hong Kong Chinese population: a computed tomographic study. Hong-Kong Dental Journal 2007; 4:90-93. |
| [17] | Fonseka MCN, Jayasinghe RM, Perera UUKPC, Wickremansinghe Y, Wettasinghe KA. Variation in root morphology of human mandibular first molars collected at a general dental practice in Nuwara-Eliya, Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka Journal of Medicine 2008;17(1), 10-14. |
| [18] | Sperber GH, Moreau JL. Study of the Number of Roots and canals in Senegalese first permanent mandibular molars. International Endodontic Journal. 1998; 31(2): 117-22.View Article |
| [19] | Czerw RJ, Fulkerson MS, Donuelly JC, Walmann JO. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy of several electronic apex locators. Journal of endodontics 1995; 21: 572-575.View Article |
| [20] | de Pablo OV, Estevez R, Péix Sánchez M, Heilborn C, Cohenca N. Root anatomy and canal configuration of the permanent mandibular first molar: a systematic review. Journal of Endodontics 2010; 36(12):1919-31.View Article PubMed |
| [21] | Alam MS, Aziz-us-salam, Prajapati K, Rai P, Molla AA. Study of tooth length and working length of first permanent molar in Bangladeshi people. Bangladesh Medical Research Council Bulletin. 2004; 30(1):36-42. PubMed |
| [22] | Kim E, Fallahrastegar A, Hur YY, Jung IY, Kim S, Lee SJ. Difference in root canal length between Asians and Caucasians. International Endodontic Journal.2005; 38(3):149-51.View Article PubMed |
| [23] | Gu Y, Lu Q, Wang P, Ni L. Root canal morphology of permanent three-rooted mandibular first molars: Part II--measurement of root canal curvatures.Journal of Endodontics 2010; 36(8):1341-6.View Article PubMed |
| [24] | Haffner C, Folwaczny M, Galler K, Hickel R. Accuracy of electronic apex locators in comparison to actual length--an in vivo study. Journal of Dentistry 2005; 33(8):619-25.View Article PubMed |
| [25] | Lipski M, Woźniak K, Lichota D, Jamroszczyk K, Nowicka A, Góra M, Trabska-Swistelnicka M, Sobolewska E, Tomasik M, Buczkowska-Radlińiska J. A comparative evaluation of Apex D.S.P. and Root ZX Apex locators. An in vitro study Annals of the Academy of Medicine Stetin. 2008; 54(2):33-6. PubMed |
| [26] | Orosco FA, Bernardineli N, Garcia RB, Bramante CM, Duarte MA, Moraes IG. In vivo accuracy of conventional and digital radiographic methods in confirming root canal working length determination by Root ZX Journal of Applied Oral Sciences. 2012; 20(5):522-5.View Article PubMed |
| [27] | Neena IE, Ananthraj A, Praveen P, Karthik V, Rani P. Comparison of digital radiography and apex locator with the conventional method in root length determination of primary teeth. Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry.2011; 29(4):300-4.View Article PubMed |
| [28] | Luigi Cianconi, Vincenzo Angotti, Roberto Felici, Gabriele Conte, Manuele Mancini. Accuracy of Three Electronic Apex Locators Compared with Digital Radiography: An Ex Vivo Study Journal of Endodontics.2005; 1-5. |
