The availability of more online courses has led to an increase in online learning options and blended learning approaches. These developments brought to light the need to equip preservice teachers with the knowledge and abilities to design online classes and activities and improve their abilities to control student behavior in online learning. This study sought to determine the effects of authentic learning tasks on preservice teachers' self-efficacy in online teaching. The researchers assessed the effect of authentic learning activities on preservice teachers' self-efficacy for online teaching using single group pretest-posttest experimental design .Data were collected using a modified version of The Michigan Nurse Educators' Sense of Efficacy for Online Teaching Scale (MNESEOT) by and the Survey of Online Teaching Perception questionnaire. A total of 32 third-year preservice teachers who were enrolled in a Principles and Strategies of Teaching Mathematics course participated in the study. The findings demonstrated that authentic activities significantly improved preservice teachers' online teaching self-efficacy scores in the areas of student engagement, instructional techniques, classroom management, and computer abilities. The results of the study demonstrate that pre-service teachers had a high level of confidence in their capacity to carry out authentic learning tasks such creating websites, maintaining blogs, directing synchronous classes, and planning presentations. Also, despite their initial hesitation brought on by their lack of experience, the pre-service mathematics teachers felt confidence in their capacity to conduct online instruction. The connection of authentic learning exercises to real-world situations increased their degree of comfort with future online education.
| [1] | K. A. Robinia, “Online Teaching Self-Efficacy of Nurse Faculty Teaching in Public, Online Teaching Self-Efficacy of Nurse Faculty Teaching in Public, Accredited Nursing Programs in The State of Michigan Accredited Nursing Programs in The State of Michigan,” 2008. [Online]. Available: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations. |
| [2] | UNESCO, “UNESCO Covid-19 Education Response,” UNESCO, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2020. |
| [3] | W. Nketsia, M. P. Opoku, A. H. Mohammed, E. O. Kumi, R. Twum, and E. A. Kyere, “Preservice Training Amid a Pandemic in Ghana: Predictors of Online Learning Success Among Teachers,” Front Educ (Lausanne), vol. 6, no. September, pp. 1-11, 2021.View Article |
| [4] | W. Nketsia, M. P. Opoku, A. H. Mohammed, E. O. Kumi, R. Twum, and E. A. Kyere, “Preservice Training Amid a Pandemic in Ghana: Predictors of Online Learning Success Among Teachers,” Front Educ (Lausanne), vol. 6, Sep. 2021.View Article |
| [5] | O. Doğru, “www.ijres.net An Investigation of Pre-service Visual Arts Teachers’ Perceptions of Computer Self-Efficacy and Attitudes Towards Web-based Instruction An Investigation of Pre-service Visual Arts Teachers’ Perceptions of Computer Self-Efficacy and Attitudes Towards Web-based Instruction,” International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), vol. 6, no. 4, p. 2020, [Online]. Available: www.ijres.net.View Article |
| [6] | J. Herrington, T. C. Reeves, and R. Oliver, “A Guide to Authentic e-Learning,” A Guide to Authentic e-Learning, 2009.View Article |
| [7] | N. Johnson, G. Veletsianos, and J. Seaman, “U.S. faculty and administrators’ experiences and approaches in the early weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic,” Online Learning Journal, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 6-21, Jun. 2020.View Article |
| [8] | B. S. Horvitz, A. L. Beach, M. L. Anderson, and J. Xia, “Examination of Faculty Self-efficacy Related to Online Teaching,” Innov High Educ, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 305-316, Aug. 2015.View Article |
| [9] | S. Pearce, “Authentic learning: what, why and how?,” vol. 2016, no. April, 2016. |
| [10] | S. Pearce, “Authentic learning: What, why and how?,” e-Teaching Management Strategies for the Classroom, 2016. |
| [11] | S. S. Willoughby et al., “Contents Preface Prologue 1. Perspectives on Mathematics Education Part 1: Numeracy and Standards 2. The Four Faces of Mathematics Part 2: Technology and the Mathematics Classroom 5. Calculators in Mathematics Teaching and Learning: Past, Present, and Future 6. Technology-Enriched Learning of Mathematics: Opportunities and Challenges.” |
| [12] | B. M. M. Lombardi and D. G. Oblinger, “Authentic Learning for the 21st Century : An Overview,” Learning, vol. 1, pp. 1-7, 2007. |
| [13] | P. Chan, R. Millier, and E. Monroe, “Cognitive apprenticeship as an instructional strategy for solving corporate training challenges,” TechTrends, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 35-41, 2009.View Article |
| [14] | J. Herrington, R. Oliver, and T. C. Reeves, “Patterns of engagement in authentic online learning environments,” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 19, no. 1, 2003.View Article |
| [15] | A. Bandura, Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Worth Publishers, 1997. |
| [16] | F. Van Acker, H. van Buuren, K. Kreijns, and M. Vermeulen, “Why teachers use digital learning materials: The role of self-efficacy, subjective norm and attitude,” Educ Inf Technol (Dordr), vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 495-514, Sep. 2013.View Article |
| [17] | H. Granziera and H. N. Perera, “Relations among teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs, engagement, and work satisfaction: A social cognitive view,” Contemp Educ Psychol, vol. 58, pp. 75-84, Jul. 2019.View Article |
| [18] | M. Zee and H. M. Y. Koomen, “Teacher Self-Efficacy and Its Effects on Classroom Processes, Student Academic Adjustment, and Teacher Well-Being: A Synthesis of 40 Years of Research,” Rev Educ Res, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 981-1015, 2016.View Article |
| [19] | A. Ü. Kan and A. Murat, “Examining the self-efficacy of teacher candidates’ lifelong learning key competences and educational technology standards,” Educ Inf Technol (Dordr), vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 707-724, Mar. 2020.View Article |
| [20] | A. G. Büssing, S. Menzel, M. Schnieders, V. Beckmann, and M. Basten, “Values and beliefs as predictors of pre-service teachers’ enjoyment of teaching in inclusive settings,” Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, vol. 19, no. S1, pp. 8-23, Dec. 2019.View Article |
| [21] | Y. He, “Universal Design for Learning in an Online Teacher Education Course: Enhancing Learners’ Confidence to Teach Online,” 2014. |
| [22] | H. Ucar and M. Yazici Bozkaya, “PRE-SERVICE EFL TEACHERS’ SELF-EFFICACY BELIEFS, GOAL ORIENTATIONS, AND PARTICIPATIONS IN AN ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT,” 2016.View Article |
| [23] | A. Bandura, “Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change,” 1977.View Article PubMed |
| [24] | Q. Dai, Y. Guan, and H. Shen, “Empirical Study of Factors on Teachers’ Online Teaching Satisfaction in Higher Education Institutions,” 2021.View Article |
| [25] | N. Dabbagh and C. Williams Blijd, “Students’ Perceptions of Their Learning Experiences in an Authentic Instructional Design Context,” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, vol. 4, no. 1, Feb. 2010.View Article |
| [26] | T. S. Chang, H. H. Lin, and M. M. Song, “University faculty members’ perceptions of their teaching efficacy,” Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 49-60, Feb. 2011.View Article |
| [27] | K. A. Robinia and M. L. Anderson, “Online teaching efficacy of nurse faculty,” Journal of Professional Nursing, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 168-175, 2010.View Article PubMed |
