Open Access Peer-reviewed

A Microsoft Learning Content Development System (LCDS) Based Learning Package for Electrical and Electronics Technology-Issues on Acceptability and Usability in Nigeria

Ayotola AREMU1,, Bamidele Michael EFUWAPE2

1Department of Teacher Education, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria

2Vocational and Technical Education Department, Tai Solarin University of Education, Ijebu-Ode, Nigeria

American Journal of Educational Research. 2013, 1(2), 41-48. DOI: 10.12691/education-1-2-2
Published online: August 25, 2017


This study reported the use of a Free Open Source Software (FOSS), the Microsoft Learning Content Development System (Ms LCDS) to design and develop a learning package in electrical and electronic technology for teaching thermionic emission and investigated the acceptability and usability of the learning package. This study adopted a descriptive survey design. 80 students of electrical and electronics engineering and technology were randomly selected from two higher institutions in the country. A structured questionnaire with a reliability coefficient of 0.89 was used for data collection. Six research questions were raised and data collected was analysed using mean, standard deviation and Multiple Regression at 0.05 level of significance. The research findings revealed high acceptability and usability levels of the learning package (Mean=5.14 and Mean=3.35 respectively). A significant joint effect of self-efficacy, attitude and subjective satisfaction was revealed on acceptability (F (3, 76) =9.458; p<0.05) while a significant joint effect of perceived enjoyment, self-efficacy, attitude and subjective satisfaction was revealed on usability (F (4, 75) =9.418; p<0.05). Based on the findings, it is recommended amongst other things that computer assisted materials or packages be developed for topics that may need some extra support to teach.


traditional teaching approach, electrical and electronics technology, technology-based learning package, FOSS, LCDS, acceptability, usability
[1]  Altun, T, Yigit, N. & Alev, N. “The Effects of Computer Supported Materials on Student Achievements and Perceptions in Science Education”, in Conference IMCL 2007, Amman, Jordan. 18-20, April 2007.
[2]  Bakac, M, Tasoglu, K. A. and Akbay, T, “The effect of computer assisted instruction with simulation in science and physics activities on the success of student: Electric current”, Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 1(1), 34-42. Jan. 2011.
[3]  Bertrand1, M. and Bouchard, S, “Applying the technology acceptance model with people who are favorable to its use”. Journal of Cyber Therapy & Rehabilitation, 1(2), 200-210. 2008.
[4]  Brinkmann, D. T, “Corporate developments and strategic alliances in e-learning”. Journal of Education and Training, 43(5), 256-267. 2005.
[5]  Burkhardt, B. Designing Educational Systems: Creating Our Future in a Changing World. Educational Technology Publications, 1994.
[6]  Busari, O.O, Towards Rethink of Science and Technology Education in Nigeria, Mukugamu & brother Ent., 2004.
[7]  Erdat, C, “Open source software in teaching physics: A case study on vector algebra and visual representations”, The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(1), 1303-1321, 2006.
[8]  Govindasamy, T, “Successful implementation of e-learning pedagogical considerations”, Journal of Internet and Higher Education, 4 (1), 287-299. 2002.
[9]  Grigory, G, Gerard, C and Jon, B. Flexible Learning in a Digital World: Experiences and Expectations, Kogan Page, London, 2009.
[10]  Ithaka, J. D, “User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models”, Journal of Management Science, 35(8), 90-104. 2011.
[11]  Joseph G.Q, Karen, K, David, R, Linda, C. and Angela, M, “Computer-based learning packages have a role, but care needs to be given as to when they are delivered”, Journal of Educational Development and Biological Sciences, 23(3), 99-113. 2009.
[12]  Nurse, R, “Computer-Assisted Versus Traditional Classroom Instruction to Promote Change in the Nursing Management of the Second Stage of Labor,” Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Science Education, Texas Woman's University, Denton, Texas. 2009.
[13]  Olasumbo S. A. and Ogunbiyi O,” Learning and Teaching Styles in Language, Science and Technology Education in Nigeria”, British Journal of Arts and Social Science, .5(2), 155-162. 2012.
[14]  Ong, C. S. and Lai, J. Y, “Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance”. Journal of Computers in Human Behavior, 22(5), 816-829. 2006.View Article
[15]  Park, S. Y, “An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students' behavioral intention to use e-learning”, Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 12 (3), 150-162. 2009.
[16]  Rothney, M. P, Roselli, R. J. and Howard L. P, “Creation of an Online Vector Addition Tutorial: Exploring the Advantages of Providing Diagnostic, Multilevel Feedback in Basic Skills Remediation”. In ASEE Annual Conference, (CD-ROM DEStech Publications) Session 2793: 7 pages, 2003.
[17]  Serin, O, “The effect of the computer-based instruction on the achievement and problem solving skills of the science and technology students”. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(1), 183-201. Jan. 2011.
[18]  Rod Dixon. (2006). Open Source Software Law. Retrieved from,M1 on 16th March, 2009.
[19]  Umoren, G, “A science–technology–society paradigm and Cross River State secondary school students’ scientific literacy: problem solving and decision making,” Educational Research and Review 2(4), 082-091. 2007.
[20]  Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D, “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies,” Journal of Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. 2000.View Article
[21]  Venkatesh, V. and Morris, M. G, “Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their roles in technology acceptance and usage behavior,” MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115-140. 2000.View Article
[22]  Wenchieh, W. and Hwang, L. Y, “The effectiveness of e-learning for blended courses in colleges: A multi-level empirical study,” International Journal of Electronic Business Management, 8(4), 312-322. 2010.