Machines for In-Pipe Inspection

Alexander Gmiterko, Ivan Virgala, Lubica Miková, Peter Frankovský, Tatiana Kelemenová, Michal Kelemen

Journal of Automation and Control

Machines for In-Pipe Inspection

Alexander Gmiterko1, Ivan Virgala1, Lubica Miková1, Peter Frankovský1, Tatiana Kelemenová1, Michal Kelemen1,

1Department of Mechatronics, Technical University of Kosice, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Kosice, Slovak Republic

Abstract

The paper deals with in-pipe machines based on directional friction and inertial stepping principle. Both type are developed for inner pipe with diameter 11 mm. The main purpose is inspection of inner pipe wall as prevention of cracks.

Cite this article:

  • Alexander Gmiterko, Ivan Virgala, Lubica Miková, Peter Frankovský, Tatiana Kelemenová, Michal Kelemen. Machines for In-Pipe Inspection. Journal of Automation and Control. Vol. 3, No. 3, 2015, pp 79-82. http://pubs.sciepub.com/automation/3/3/8
  • Gmiterko, Alexander, et al. "Machines for In-Pipe Inspection." Journal of Automation and Control 3.3 (2015): 79-82.
  • Gmiterko, A. , Virgala, I. , Miková, L. , Frankovský, P. , Kelemenová, T. , & Kelemen, M. (2015). Machines for In-Pipe Inspection. Journal of Automation and Control, 3(3), 79-82.
  • Gmiterko, Alexander, Ivan Virgala, Lubica Miková, Peter Frankovský, Tatiana Kelemenová, and Michal Kelemen. "Machines for In-Pipe Inspection." Journal of Automation and Control 3, no. 3 (2015): 79-82.

Import into BibTeX Import into EndNote Import into RefMan Import into RefWorks

At a glance: Figures

1. Introduction

In-pipe micromachines are able to move in the pipe to inspect or to repair the pipe or other special tasks. Pipe is as confined space i.e. this is constraint for micromachine dimensions, degrees of freedom etc. There are a lot of interdisciplinary problems in design and realisation of in-pipe micromachine. It is difficult to choose suitable actuators, sensors, and power supply etc.

In term of biological analogy, it is possible to divide ways of locomotion into two main groups (Figure 1) [1-20][1]:

• artificial locomotion,

• biological inspired locomotion.

In term of physical principle, we can divide both these groups into several basic locomotion ways (see Figure 1). It is important to say that it is not final and changeless dividing.

Wheeled locomotion principle: Wheels are standard synthetic components, which are very often used for locomotion purposes. However inner pipe wall is not perfect. There are a lot of obstacles, which have various characters. When inner pipe wall is dirty, wheels tend to slipping.

Crawled locomotion principle: Tracks is also unfinished rotating element. It is most adaptable to surface then wheels but it is not so often used as wheels.

Legged locomotion principle: Legs are components, which have inspiration in biology (e.g. spider, cockroach etc.). Many biological organisms are able to locomote via legs and reach high speed. These organisms overcome difficult obstacles and there are fascinating for designers.

Inchworm-like principle: The inchworm strategy comes from biological example. The inchworm is capable of manoeuvring in extremely small spaces, it can do so in arbitrary orientations to gravity and can withstand substantial external forces attempting to diverge it from its intended course. It can do these things because its mobility system is governed by a simple rule: "Never let go of what you're holding until you're holding something else!“.

Inertial stepping locomotion principle: The principle based on fact that a part of device (inertial mass) oscillates with suitable frequency. Backward tendency of motion is damped.

Worm-like locomotion principle: The locomotion uses difference characteristic of friction between device and pipe wall. Forward friction force is less then backward friction force. It causes that device locomotes in forward direction.

Travelling wave locomotion principle: Device has articulated body and generates travelling wave from head to tail [4, 5, 6, 7].

2. In-pipe Machine Based on Directional Friction

Subject of the article is in-pipe micromachine which locomotes via worm-like principle based on directional friction. Motive forces must be generated internally and then the system will use friction and constraints and shape changes to move. With humans, the frictional forces are isotropic, i.e., sliding a foot forward cause the other foot to slide backwards. That is why we must lift one foot to reposition it while the other foot remains static. But snakes and worms remain in contact with the ground and can have anisotropic frictional forces because of their scales [21].

When sliding forward the frictional forces are minimal, but when a body segment slides backward, the scales dig in and the frictional force becomes very large. Worm can be substituted with one spring, two masses (Figure 2). When the spring is expanded (l increases) scale B slides over the ground and scale A grips the ground. Then the spring is contracted and scale A slides and scale B digs in and grips.

Figure 2. Worm-like in-pipe locomotion principle – directional friction principle

So changing (oscillating) the spring length will result in forward motion. A real worm consists of many segments like the above (Figure 2). To prevent having only one scale gripping, the worm sends a wave of compression from its head to its tail. In a real worm, the wave is a square wave. However, with the simple spring-mass model, a square wave creates shape distortions and a sine wave works better describes the locomotion [21].

The in-pipe micromachine (Figure 3) locomotes via worm-like principle described above. It consists of a piezoactuator (1), which converts electrical energy form to mechanical energy form. Just piezoactuator transformation cannot provide in-pipe locomotion. So there is a need of other mechanical parts – bristle plate (2, 3) and bristles (4). These mechanical parts add another function to piezoactuator. Energy transformation can be controlled with any microcomputer. Finally, locomotion can be obtained with this synergic integration.

Figure 3. Worm-like in-pipe machine based on directional friction principle. 1 – piezoactuator, linear motor; 2 – head bristle plate; 3 – back bristle plate; 4 – bristles; 5 – screw; 6 – pipe

Mechanical parts provide force coupling with inner pipe wall and diagonally attached bristles, which cause anisotropic character of friction force between bristle tip and pipe wall.

The control system, which generates suitably modulated voltage, provide actuator controlling. There is a need of organs and parts optimisation for effective utilisation of energy transformation. Hence, mechatronics design approach is necessary. It means that actuator is supported with mechanical part. Another possible way of improving is to add another function to bristles. So, implementation of another actuator gives to bristles new function. Another actuator is able to drive bristle parameters, and these bristles become an intelligent “smart bristles”. Bristle properties cannot be improved, moreover, by classic design approach, so there is a place for intelligence integration. Finally, the integration gives better properties to system, which becomes competitive in this class of micromachine.

Bristle is simple one leaf spring with constant cross-section. Bristles are attached as cantilevers to a bristle plate diagonally. A characteristic property is bigger deformability, which is typical for springs. High deformability is ensured with using of material with high compliance otherwise with using of material with high stiffness which is suitable shaped.

Bristles are unloaded if micromachine is out of the pipe. Bristles are designed with parameters which secure that bristle tip span are bigger than inner pipe diameter. So, after in-pipe micromachine application into pipe, bristles are deformed. Let’s assume that deformations of pipe are negligible. Deformations of bristles depend on geometrical deviations of inner pipe diameter and roundness deviation. It means that, bristle tip span has to equal with inner pipe diameter.

If the in-pipe micromachine doesn’t locomote, there is only normal force, which is applied to inner pipe wall. The normal force depends on bristle deflection, bristle stiffness and assembling bristle angle. When excitation force will be applied and it will be continuously increased, if micromachine starts locomotion, value of the excitation force will be equal to adhesive part of friction force Fto.

Bristles are also used as part for creating force coupling with inner pipe wall in [17, 18, 19, 20, 21]. Diagonally bristle attaching is suitable because of anisotropic character of friction between bristle tip and pipe wall. The friction force in forward direction is less than friction force in backward direction. The difference of these friction forces causes the forward locomotion of in-pipe micromachine. Work [17] doesn’t deal with other details about this phenomenon and doesn’t specify conditions, which is necessary for the phenomena. Bristles are substituted with fins and blades in [17, 18, 19, 20, 21].

Friction force between inner pipe wall (Figure 4) and bristle tip can be described with equation:

(1)

Analogical, it is also possible to derive friction force for moving in backward (Figure 5) direction and it is given as:

(2)

where:

– friction force between bristle tip and pipe wall in forward direction

– friction force between bristle tip and pipe wall in backward direction

– adhesive coefficient of friction

– bristle angle to angle of body

If we will assume that normal force will not change, we can write equations (1) and (2) into one common equation:

(3)

As we can see from equation (3), friction force in forward direction is still less than friction force in backward direction.

If the value of coefficient of friction f will converge to cotgα1, then friction force in backward direction will converge to infinity, so micromachine will be automatically locked.

The self-locking mechanism causes forward locomotion of most worms and snakes. It is very difficult to influence of friction coefficient value, so we have to find different way of bristle optimisation. The criterion of optimisation is the maximal difference between forward and backward friction force.

Figure 6 shows the machine velocity dependence on traction force of in-pipe machine.

3. In-pipe Machine Based on Inertial Stepping Principle

Figure 7 shows the outlook photograph of the developed micromachine. Dimensions are 10 mm in diameter, 45 mm in length, 10 g in weight.

Figure 7. In-pipe machine based on inertial stepping principle

The micromachine is composed of these units: a electromagnet, a adjusting unit, a permanent magnet, a guide rod, a damping spring and bristles. The bristles serve as a clamping element which contacts the pipe wall to hold the weight of machine both in horizontal pipe and in the vertical pipe [22].

Figure 8 shows the mobile principle of the micromachine. When the repulsive force produced by a magnetic field of the electromagnet effects on the permanent magnet, the magnet moves from the electromagnet. During the contact of magnet with the damping spring, the repulsive force is finished. As result, the magnet returns to electromagnet. In the moment of impact of the magnet with electromagnet, the micromachine moves forward, because impact force exceeds the maximum static friction force of the micromachine bristle tip with pipe wall. Consequently, by repeating this cycle the micromachine moves forward. In addition, the spring function of the bristle enables to move in-pipe whose diameter is little of variety.

Figure 8. Simplified motion cycle of in-pipe machine based on inertial stepping principle

The speed of the micromachine depends on the distance electromagnet from the spring and the repulsive force duration. The maximum speed was 20 mm/s in the horizontal direction and 15 mm/s in the vertical direction in the glass pipe, at 10-12 ms repulsive force duration and at 1,5 – 2 mm of the distance the spring from the magnet (in while of turned off electromagnet). Figure 9 shows speed versus load characteristic.

4. Conclusion

In-pipe machines are able to locomote inside pipes and they are used mainly for inspection tasks of pipe systems like steam generators, heat exchangers, pipeline for gas, oil, water etc. Inside pipe are technologic remainders in elbows, fittings, reductions. Also inner diameter are not constant, cross-section of pipe has big deviation of roundness. Roundness on inner pipe wall varies and pipe wall are very dirty and very often pipe wall is covered with sediments. Pipe is constrained space and all these factors are affecting the design of the in-pipe machines [23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28].

Acknowledgement

The work has been accomplished under the research projects No. VEGA 1/1205/12 and KEGA 048TUKE-4/2014 financed by the Slovak Ministry of Education".

References

[1]  Suzumori, K., Miyagawa, T., Kimura, M., and Hasegawa Y., (1999) “Micro Inspection Robot for 1-in Pipes”, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Vol. 4, No. 3, September 1999, 286-292.
In article      View Article
 
[2]  Hirose, S., Ohno, H., Mitsui, T., and Suyama, K., (1999) “Design of In-Pipe Inspection Vehicles for φ25, φ50, φ150 Pipes,” Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Detroit, Michigan, May 1999, pp2309-2314.
In article      View Article
 
[3]  Roslin, N. S. et al. (2012) “A Review: Hybrid Locomotion of In-pipe Inspection Robot”, Procedia Engineering 41 (2012) 1456-1462.
In article      View Article
 
[4]  A, Ma S. “Mobility of an in-pipe robot with screw drive mechanism inside curved pipes”. In: Proc. IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics. (); 2010. p. 1530-5.
In article      View Article
 
[5]  Zhang, Y., Yan, G. (2007) “In-pipe inspection robot with active pipe-diameter adaptability and automatic tractive force adjusting”, Mechanism and Machine Theory 42 (2007) 1618-1631.
In article      View Article
 
[6]  Jun, , , Zongquan, D., (2011) “Design method of Modular Units for Articulated in-Pipe Robot Inspecting System”, 2011 IEEE Second International Conference on Digital Manufacturing & Automation, 389-392.
In article      
 
[7]  Lee, D., Park, J., Hyun, D., Yook, G., Yang, H., (2012) “Novel mechanisms and simple locomotion strategies for an in-pipe robot that can inspect various pipe types”, Mechanism and Machine Theory 56 (2012) 52-68.
In article      View Article
 
[8]  Lim, J., Park, H., Moon S., and Kim B., (2007), “Pneumatic Robot Based on Inchworm Motion for Small Diameter Pipe Inspection”, Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, December 15-18, 2007, Sanya, China, 330-335.
In article      PubMed
 
[9]  Kuwada, A., Tsujino, K., Suzumori, K., Kanda, T., (2006), “Intelligent Actuators Realizing Snake-like Small Robot for Pipe Inspection”, Proc. of International Symposium on Micro-NanoMechatronics and Human Science, 2006, , 1-6.
In article      View Article
 
[10]  Liu, W. et al. (2010) “An in-pipe wireless swimming microrobot driven by giant magnetostrictive thin film”, Sensors and Actuators A 160 (2010) 101-108/ Wei Liu, Xinghua Jia, Fuji Wang, Zhenyuan Jia.
In article      View Article
 
[11]  Hayashi, , Iwatsuki, N." and Iwashina, S., (1995) “The Running Characteristics of a Screw-Principle Microrobot in a Small Bent Pipe”, Proc. of Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science 1995, 225-228.
In article      View Article
 
[12]  Jong-Hoon, K., Sharma, G. ; Iyengar, S.S. (2010) “FAMPER: A fully autonomous mobile robot for pipeline exploration”. 2010 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT), Vina del Mar, 14-17 March 2010, p. 517-523.
In article      
 
[13]  Bertetto AM, Ruggiu M., “In-pipe inch-worm pneumatic flexible robot”. In: Proc. IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics, vol. 2. ; 2001. p. 1226-31.
In article      View Article
 
[14]  Qiao, J, Shang, J, Goldenberg, A., “Development of inchworm in-pipe robot based on self-locking mechanism”. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Digital Object Identifier 10, 1109/TMECH; 2012s.
In article      
 
[15]  Takahashi, M., Hayashi, , Iwatsuki, N., Suzumori, K., and Ohki, N., “The development of an in-pipe microrobot applying the motion of an earthworm,” in Proc. IEEE 5th Int. Symp. Micro Machine and Human Sciences, 1994, pp. 35-40.
In article      View Article
 
[16]  Neubauer, W., “Locomotion with articulated legs in pipes or dusts,” Robot. Autonomous Syst., vol. 11, nos. 3-4, pp. 163-169, 1993.
In article      View Article
 
[17]  Idogaki, T., “Characteristics of piezoelectric locomotive mechanism for an in-pipe micro inspection machine”. Proc. of MHS’95, p.193-198. .
In article      View Article
 
[18]  Aoschima, S., Tsujimuri, T., Yabuta, T., (1989) “Design and analysis of a midget mobile robot using piezo vibration for mobility in a thin tube”. Proc. of the International Conference on Advanced Mechatronics, , 1989, p. 659-663.
In article      
 
[19]  Fukuda, T. et al., “Giant magnetostrictive alloy (GMA) applications to micro mobile robot as a micro actuator without power supply cables,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Workshop Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), Jan. 1991, pp. 210-215.
In article      View Article
 
[20]  Degani, A., Feng, S., Choset, H., and Mason, M. T., “Minimalistic, Dynamic, Tube Climbing Robot”, Proc. of 2010 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Anchorage Convention District, May 3-8, 2010, Anchorage, Alaska, USA. (2010) 1100-1101.
In article      View Article
 
[21]  Ostertag, O., Ostertagová, E., Kelemen, M., Kelemenová, T., Buša, J., and Virgala, I., (2014) “Miniature Bristled In-Pipe Machine”, Int J Adv Robot Syst, 2014, 11:189.
In article      View Article
 
[22]  Yum, Y.J., Hwang, H.S., Kelemen, M., Maxim, V., and Frankovský, P. (2014) “In-pipe micromachine locomotion via the inertial stepping principle”, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 28 (8) (2014), 3237-3247.
In article      View Article
 
[23]  Vitko, A., Jurišica, L., Kľúčik, M., Duchoň, F., (2008) “Context Based Intelligent Behaviour of Mechatronic Systems”, Acta Mechanica Slovaca. Vol. 12, No. 3-B. pp. 907-916.
In article      
 
[24]  Koniar, D., Hargaš, L., Hrianka, M., “The application of DICOM 7th standard in LabView”, Proc. of Biom. , Kladno (2007).
In article      PubMed
 
[25]  Dekan, M., Duchoň, F., Jurišica, L., Vitko, A., Babinec, A., “iRobot Create Used in Education”, Journal of Mechanics Engineering and Automation. - Vol. 3, Iss. 4, 2013, pages 197-202, (2013).
In article      
 
[26]  Kelemenova, T. et al. (2012) “Bristled In-pipe Machine Inside Pipe With Geometric Deviations”, Procedia Engineering, Elsevier, Volume 48, 2012, Pages 287-294. 852, 282-287.
In article      View Article
 
[27]  Kelemen M., Virgala I., Miková Ľ., Frankovský P., Experimental Identification of Linear Actuator Properties, Acta Mechanica Slovaca. Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 42-47.
In article      
 
[28]  Hargaš, L., Hrianka, M., Koniar, D., and Izák, P., “Quality Assessment SMT Technology by Virtual Instrumentation”, Applied Electronics 2007, Pilsen, 5. – 6. 9. 2007, (2007).
In article      
 
  • CiteULikeCiteULike
  • MendeleyMendeley
  • StumbleUponStumbleUpon
  • Add to DeliciousDelicious
  • FacebookFacebook
  • TwitterTwitter
  • LinkedInLinkedIn