Abstract

The Peacock eel, Macrognathus aculeatus is a near threatened highly valuable small indigenous species in Bangladesh. It is not only toothsome nutritive table fish but also notable aquarium species but still rely on natural stock. Keeping in mind the paucity of information on the biology which is crucial to develop artificial propagation and culture technique of this species, the present research was performed as an attempt to contribute to the information on the taxonomy and other biological aspects of M. aculeatus. Total 50 samples were collected from Khulna region during April to May 2014 to assay. The taxonomical study revealed that the total length, standard length, head length, eye diameter, pre and post orbital length; length of dorsal, anal and caudal fin; length of upper and lower jaw; body depth and width, distance between dorsal fin to caudal fin ranged from 17.00-21.00, 15.00-19.00, 0.80-3.00, 0.20-0.40, 0.50-2.10, 0.30-1.70, 3.10-6.70, 3.50-6.30, 0.50-1.50, 0.30-1.00, 0.70-1.80, 0.90-2.30, 0.60-1.20, 0.70-2.40 cm respectively, additionally meristic character’s formula appeared like D. 19 - 39, A. 11 - 18, C. 29 – 52, L. 11-15 and number of eye spots on dorsal fin, 3-10. Turning to the biological inquiry which showed that the fish weight (g), gonad weight (g), liver weight (g), gut weight (g), gonadosomatic, alimentosomatic and hepatosomatic index and condition factor ranged from 15.10-28.60, 2.32-3.18, 0.029-0.044, 0.64-1.08, 9.69-14.79, 2.58-4.15, 0.11-0.19 and 0.30-0.40 respectably. The mean values of hepatosomatic and alimentosomatic indices persuaded greater liver activity and feeding intensity in M. aculeatus. Moreover, stomach content depicted that the diet of peacock eel composed of small fish species, small prawn, prawn larvae, earthworm, water strider, insects pupae, Metaphire posthuma, Caenorhabditis, sand and mud for instance, which in brief expressed that M. aculeatus is omnivorous in its feeding habits. Indeed, this preliminary research outcome would be utile for the species identification, seed production, developing culture technologies as well as biodiversity conservation of this near threatened fish species.

1. Introduction

The Peacock eel, Macrognathus aculeatus is a near threatened highly valuable small indigenous species (Mastacembelidae) in Bangladesh ¹. Different freshwater habitats of Asia and South East Asia are the main distribution area of this species ². This species is mainly availability in rivers, canals, beels, and ponds and inundated fields throughout Bangladesh. It is not only toothsome nutritive table fish but also notable aquarium species. Notwithstanding its palatability and consumer preference, a little information is available on the biology of this fish ³. Focusing the consumers’ penchant, nutritional, economic and aesthetic value as well as to preserve the biodiversity of M. aculeatus should be protected from being extinct. Biological studies of this species are indispensable for developing suitable breeding and culture technologies. Very little attempt has been made in the country to promote its breeding and culture. Consequently, keeping in mind the paucity of information on the biology of this species, the present study was focused on the taxonomy and other biological aspects like condition factor; gonadosomatic, hepatosomatic and alimentosomatic index, food and feeding habits of M. aculetus ⁴ which would be utile for the artificial propagation and developing culture technologies of this fish in aquaculture sector.

2. Materials and Methods

A total number of 50 specimens of M. aculeatus were collected from Khulna region during April to May 2014. Samples were instantly preserved with ice and fixed with 5% formalin on arrival in the laboratory. The morphometric and meristic characters were studied in Fish Biology Laboratory, Fisheries and Marine Resource Technology Discipline of Khulna University, Bangladesh. Body weight in gram was recorded by electric balance.

At first, external morphology was investigated to collect different qualitative feature detail of peacock eel samples. Seventeen morphometric characters viz., body weight, head length, total length, standard length, pre orbital length, post orbital length, anal fin length, dorsal fin length, caudal fin length, upper jaw length, lower jaw length, eye diameter, height of body, width of body, distance between dorsal and caudal fin, length of lateral line, gonad weight, liver and gut weight along with body color were recorded separately. The measurements were taken by using normal centimeter scale, fine pointed divider, forceps and slide calipers and recorded to the nearest centimeter. Additionally, four meristic characters namely anal fin ray, dorsal fin ray, caudal fin ray number and number of eye spots on dorsal fin were recorded separately ⁵.

M. aculeatus samples were dissected by vertical incision on the ventral side for biological study. Gonad, gut and liver were separated and weighted consequently by using electric balance. The digestion of food items was ceased within few minutes by gutting and preserved guts in separate numbered bottles with 5% formalin. Gonadosomatic index (GSI), Hepatosomatic index (HIS), Alimentosomatic Index (ASI), Condition factor (CF) were determined according to ^{6, 7, 8, 9}; respectively.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

Food particles were identified by systematic status of the chief constituents of the foregut contents using the keys as given by ^{10, 11, 12}.

Data were fixed up, analyzed as well as presented in tabular and graphical forms. Mean, range of each type of data and mean of ratios of morphometric characters were estimated in the present study. Linear regression analysis was performed to determine the relations between different characters of the species. All the statistical analysis was done with the aid of Microsoft office excels and KalidaGraph software.

3. Results

M. aculeatus possessed an elongated, eel shaped and compressed body form with a long fleshy snout with a tri-lobed extremity and a short rounded caudal fin that was separated from dorsal and anal fins. Mouth was positioned ventrally and eyes were small. Part of the body was brownish to yellowish and marked with two long dark bands on either side ventrally. False ‘eye’ spots were also observed at the base of dorsal fin. Since samples were sampled randomly from different local markets, the samples were obviously of heterogeneous. Thus the proportion would give the real picture. Mean and range of various morphometric characters, body proportions and meristic characters of M. aculeatus were present in the Table 1 and Table 2.

Positive linear relationship were observed between various morphometric characters such like standard length with total length (R² = 0.98), dorsal fin length (R² = 0.95), head length (R² = 0.90), anal fin length (R² = 0.89), caudal fin length (R² = 0.90), height of body (R² = 0.86), width of body (R² = 0.72); with pre orbital length (R² = 0.92), eye diameter (R² = 0.62), length of upper jaw (R² = 0.91), length of lower jaw (R² = 0.75); additionally body weight with total length (R² = 0.83) and standard length (R² = 0.83) and height of body with width of body (R² = 0.69) measurements in the present investigation (Figure 1 -Figure 14).

Mean and range of different biological parameters were mentioned in Table 3. The relationships between fish weight, gonad weight and GSI, liver weight and HSI, gut weight and ASI, and CF were linear (Figure 15 - Figure 27).

The fishes were all with full stomachs. None of the specimens had an absolutely empty stomach. It was noted that in the case of small fish samples, almost all had their stomachs in full or gorged state during the investigation period. Bloodworms, flake foods, insect larvae, oligochaetes, earthworms, small prawn, prawn larvae, crustaceans, mollusks were observed in the foregut of the samples (Table 4). The stomach contents were found to contain mixed food items. The contents of the rectum were also examined, but since it contained only a well ground pulpy mass, the exact nature of the constituents could not be fully determined. Food items indicated that they are omnivorous in feeding habits.

4. Discussion

The recent research showed that M. aculeatus which is internationally known as Peacock eel and nationally as Tara baim, possessed an elongated eel shaped compressed body form with a short rounded tail fin that was separated from long dorsal and anal fin. Additional morphometric character like mouth was positioned ventrally, small eyes and snout with a tri-lobed extremity were observed. Moreover, the ventral part of the body was brownish to yellowish and marked with two long dark bands on either side. Three to eleven ocelli were also observed at the base of dorsal fin. Above mentioned findings were more or less similar to the ^{2, 13} and ¹⁴.

The taxonomic study depicted total length and total weight of M. aculeatus ranging from 17.01-20.02 cm and 19.00-29.00 g. The mean total length and total weight were 18.63 ± 0.83 cm and 23.25 ± 2.21 g respectively. The maximum TL of M. aculeatus found in this study was much lower than the maximum recorded value by ^{15, 16, 17, 18} while slightly higher than ³. Regional dissimilarities in total length probably depend on the ecological conditions in the areas of research. In addition, ¹⁹ and ²⁰ mentioned water temperature can be directly linked to rates of biological production and food availability, as well as to nekton and plankton species composition, both of which influence fish growth. ³ who stated that total length of M. aculeatus was ranging from 9.20-19.71 cm and total weight ranging from 15.10-28.60 g, which support the recent findings.

In this research, the fin formula of M. aculeatus appeared like the following: D1. 14-20/52-56, A. 3/50-54. The formulas for this species recorded by ²¹ were D. 16-20/44-54, A. 2-3/44-52; while ¹³ were D. 17-20/45-50, A. 3/46-50 which is almost similar to the recent findings. Lateral line was present; 11-15. Additionally, a series of 3-10 large black ocelli having white edge was present along base of dorsal.

²² stated that the average of condition factor (CF) in riverine and beel populations of spiny eel were found to be 0.50±0.09, and 0.47±0.05, respectively. In this study, mean condition factor of all samples of M. aculeatus was found 0.3600±0.0225 ranged from 0.3035 to 0.4014. The condition factor is the relationship between length and weight of fish. The value of it is influenced by several factors. ²³ stated that the condition factor is not constant and found to vary in an individual, species or a population having relationship between seasonal changes in the environment and with the changes of physiological conditions of the fishes.

Furthermore, ²⁴ reported the condition factor decreased as weight and growth increases, moreover was maximum at non breeding seasons and reduced in peaked breeding season in Mastacembelus armatus. The condition factor was relatively depended upon food availability and ecological parameters.

²⁵ reported that the gonadosomatic index (GSI) for fecund striped M. aculeatus ranges from 0.44±0.06 to 14.40±1.48. Mean gonadosomatic index of all samples of M. aculeatus of this research was found to be 12.50±1.38 ranging from 9.69 to 14.79. The reason of this dissimilarities could be season of sample collection. The relationships between fish weight, gonad weight and GSI were linear. The gonadosomatic index itself is more useful to evaluate reproductive potential when used in conjunction with other techniques. The models of potential fecundity as they relate to size (total length and body weight) could be useful when applied to catch statistics of length and weight in populations with known size and age frequency distributions. This application would allow reasonable estimates of potential fecundity for the populations of M. aculeatus.

The hepatosomatic index is an indicator of activity of liver. The findings of the present study stated that the mean hepatosomatic index of M. aculeatus was 0.034± 0.003 ranged from 0.029 to 0.044. This indicated the greater activity of liver of in M. aculeatus. It also concluded that M. aculeatus is omnivorous species. Lack of adequate information on hepatosomatic index of this species encumbers the comparison with other studies. However, ²⁶ stated that omnivorous fishes require more intense liver activity than the herbivorous fish, which support this finding.

The feeding intensity was considered by determining alimentosomatic Index. Present study stated that mean alimentosomatic index of all M. aculeatus samples was 3.53±0.33 ranged from 2.58 to 4.15 which indicated the greater feeding intensity in M. aculeatus. Likewise, ⁴ concluded the most active feeding period in both sexes of peacock eel is the stage at which gonad ripens during march to middle April while there was no cessation of feeding in any period of their life.

²⁷ reviewed in some detail the literature on the food and feeding habits of M. aculeatus, as pointed out by them, are variously described as Bloodworms, flake foods, insect larvae, oligochaetes etc. Furthermore, ²⁸ and ⁴ proposed that Teleostomi (Puntius) was the most preferred prey organisms of peacock eel. Subsequently, other preferred organisms were Esomus, dipterans larvae, prawn, earthworm, brine shrimp and hemipteran larvae according to the criteria of frequency of occurrence. The remaining prey categories of lesser importance were gastropods and some unidentified materials. In other words, the findings of the present research reached in same conclusion. This study expressed that Nematode (Caenorhabditis) were also food item of peacock eel which could engulf accidentally. ²⁹ mentioned the parasites Nematode were much more abundant in rainy season (75%) followed by summer (62.5%) and winter (31.81%) in different parts of the alimentary canal and body cavity of M. aculeatus. In particular, the larger fishes were heavily infected (71.01%) than medium (53.33%) and smaller (52.17%) fishes, which supported our findings. All the outcomes related to food and feeding habit of this research suggested the possibility of the M. aculeatus being omnivorous as mentioned by ^{4, 27, 28}.

5. Conclusion

The outcome of this research can be implemental for species identification, captive breeding, conservation of Peacock Eel as well as for set up suitable culture technique. However, in spite of having keen interest, it would be not possible to work on influencing factors like season, area and so on for breeding and feeding ecology owing to inadequate facilities. Hence, emphasis should be placed on further investigation on effect of different factors like season, area and condition on breeding biology and feeding ecology in order to identify important factors and times.

Acknowledgements

References