Analysis the Physical Impact of Implementation of a Rural Master Plan in Iran
1Rural Development Department, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology
Despite the increase in urbanization and decline in population in rural areas, many rural settlements are still dynamic and comprise a sizable portion of the population of developing countries such as Iran. The functionality of rural areas in maintaining population and rural occupations depends upon the production of an infrastructure to provide services. This requires an organized planning and development process. One tool to provide suitable conditions in rural areas is a rural master plan that provides spatial-physical organization. This case study determined the impact of the physical implementation of a rural master plan in the greater Amol region in northern Iran. The methodology was descriptive and analytical. The data was based on field studies and a questionnaire filled out by respondents from sample villages. The target research population were the rural residents from the region surrounding the city of Amol. The number participants responding to the questionnaires was determined using the Cochran formula (n= 260) and its reliability was determined by calculating Cronbach's alpha coefficient (0.92) after conducting a pilot study. The results showed that a the rural master plan was successful in widening the main streets of the village and improving infrastructure services in the area, but was not successful in the participation of the villagers in the rural master plan.
At a glance: Figures
Keywords: rural master plan, development, rural areas, Iran
American Journal of Rural Development, 2013 1 (4),
Received May 20, 2013; Revised June 17, 2013; Accepted July 10, 2013Copyright: © 2013 Science and Education Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
Cite this article:
- Hanif, Mikaeil, Ebrahimi Mohammad Sadegh, and Amini Amir Mozafar. "Analysis the Physical Impact of Implementation of a Rural Master Plan in Iran." American Journal of Rural Development 1.4 (2013): 70-74.
- Hanif, M. , Sadegh, E. M. , & Mozafar, A. A. (2013). Analysis the Physical Impact of Implementation of a Rural Master Plan in Iran. American Journal of Rural Development, 1(4), 70-74.
- Hanif, Mikaeil, Ebrahimi Mohammad Sadegh, and Amini Amir Mozafar. "Analysis the Physical Impact of Implementation of a Rural Master Plan in Iran." American Journal of Rural Development 1, no. 4 (2013): 70-74.
|Import into BibTeX||Import into EndNote||Import into RefMan||Import into RefWorks|
In the past, village life and villagers’ needs were basic and sufficient; today living conditions in rural areas have changed and rural residents have new needs. To improve the quality of life in rural areas, researchers have proposed rural master plans . Such rural master plans have been implemented in a major program for rural development in Iran.
Rural master plans have been implemented for many areas. A case in oint is a master plan implemented for 9912 villages in Iran from 2000 to 2011 . Its main goals were to improve village life and persuade residents to stay in rural areas, preventing their migration to urban areas . Other goals of the implementation rural master plans are:
• Construct and improve streets and intersections
• Construct and improve sidewalks
• Develop green space
• Construct and modify water supply within the village
• Prepare land for rural development projects
• Construct bridges needed in a village
• Construct a sewage disposal network 
A master plan was developed for 24899 Iranian villages and had been implemented in 9912 by 2011 . The present study examines whether or not the rural master plan has achieved its objectives from the viewpoint of the rural resident.1.1. Master Plan
Some of the various definitions of a rural master plan are:
• Comprises changes in rural areas on physical, social and economic dimensions.
• Organizes the physical aspects of rural life and defines land use for agriculture, residential, commercial, and public use.
If the above definitions are realized, a master plan can be the most important executive strategy developed for rural areas in Iran. This strategy shows the importance of rural areas and their population capacity for the future . It also specifies the facilities and services needed for this development .
In different parts of the world, the rural master plan has been called a local plan, structure plan, comprehensive plan, design strategy, or development plan. The variation of the four main definitions are:
• Master plan: diagram or schema that shows how to develop a site or region.
• Local plan: proposes regional development by allocation of special users with exact boundaries; a written report is provided for each user.
• Structure plan: develops land use policies by a written report and diagram without a plat.
• Comprehensive area plan: provides for long-term development with specific program details .
2. Conceptual Framework
A master plan has economic, social, environmental, and cultural impacts on villages, but the physical impact is the most important. Previous studies of Iran show that comprehensive assessments have not been made for the effect of a rural master plan on the target population.
East Asian countries and members of ESCAP(1) (The United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific) implemented planning designs in rural centers. These designs were comprehensive plans to be conducted on a broad level. One design was implemented in South Korea in 1970 to create more picturesque villages. The main theme of the plan was participation of the people. The project improved rural roads, the quality of rural housing, drainage, and the drinking water supply and increased agricultural production .
Ian Whyte  studied a plan for rural settlements in Scotland and showed that when theoretical approaches and practical techniques are discussed in advance, it will improve rural settlements. Gholamrezaie  found that a rural master plan was designed and implemented without considering needs of the villagers and the active participation of the rural residents. Robinson  researched a study in East Cape Town, South Africa and showed that few of the anticipated physical changes actually occurred, which prompted an increase in migration from rural areas to the surrounding cities.
Asgari showed that the rural master plan in Iran improved the relative welfare of the villagers, but has not been successful in organizing villages . Azimi and Jamshidian  examined the impact of implementation of the rural master plan in Iran. They showed that the implementation plan improved the lives of people and increased their desire to remain in the villages, but did not succeed in advancing environmental issues or villager participation. There are also several problems in the preparation process of the plan. Papoliand Yazdi  showed that high costs, lack of villager satisfaction and participation, lack of attention to rural values and the absence of infrastructure rural planning were the most important drawbacks to the rural master plan in Iran. Amar and Samimi  showed that the implementation plan was successful in model housing construction, retrofitting village architecture, sanitary waste disposal, and villager access to services. Moradi et al  showed that the rural master plan encouraged reverse migration of villages residents back to the rural areas of Iran.
Afrakhteh et al  came to the conclusion that public awareness and knowledge of the master plan was poor, resulting in weak public participation during preparation of the master plan, its implementation and its evaluation afterward.
According to previous research and the impacts defined in rural master plan, framework of research is presented below:
3. Materials and Methods
This research was carried out by the survey method. The statistical population was the rural residents of the villages of the greater Amol region, where the master plan had been implemented. The greater Amol region encompasses 3074.4 km2 and is situated in the geographic center of Mazandaran province in northern Iran . A multistage sampling technique was applied and 260 people were selected randomly using the Cochrane formula. Data were collected from structured interviews and field observations were conducted of a pilot test to examine the reliability of the questionnaire.
Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was calculated from a Likert-type scale and the reliability of the questionnaire was determined using the Chronbach alpha test. The range for alpha was 0 to 1 and the internal reliability of the items was found using this coefficient. When the coefficient was zero, it indicated complete unreliability of the item; when the value was 1, it indicated full reliability of the item. When the alpha value was more than 0.7, the questions or item was deemed suitable for testing the concept or the related variable. Table 1 shows that the alpha values for questions and items in the questionnaire were higher than 0.7, making it scientifically valid to describe and test the relationship of the variables.
The results of this research showed that the viewpoint of rural residents are favorable toward widening main streets, building structurally sound housing, and infrastructure services after plan implementation. Variables that the rural residents viewed unfavorably were improving street access, superstructure services, improving street pavement, participation in rural construction projects, participation in infrastructure improvement and rural services (Table 2 and Table 3).
A Wilcoxon test was used to test the hypothesis. The results showed it to be statistically significant for widening main streets and improving electrical access, water supply, transportation, health care, sporting services, street pavement, education, and market development (Table 4).
The dependent variables examined were the satisfaction of rural residents toward implementation of rural master plan. Regression analysis was performed using the stepwise method and the variables influencing community satisfaction were identified. The results showed that the following variables had greatest impact on resident satisfaction: improved cultural services, improved health care, market development, participation in rural construction projects, improving street access, improved street pavement, improved water supply, and widening the main streets. The sum of these variables equaled about 58.4% of the changes in the dependent variable (Table 5).
According to Table 4, the regression equation can be written as follows:
Y= 0.317 + 0.125 X1 + 0.136 X2 + 0.121 X3 + 0.149 X4 + 0.085 X5 + 0.087 X6 + 0.102 X7+ 0.089 X8
5. Discussion and Conclusion
The rural master plan in Iran is a comprehensive plan for the development of rural areas. This study determined the impact of physical implementation of the rural master plan in the greater Amol region in Iran. The results showed that the rural master plan successfully achieved villager satisfaction for: widening main streets and improving electrical access, water supply, transportation, health care, sporting services, street pavement, education, and market development. The results agree with those of Jamshidian , Amar and Samimi , and Anabestani . The unsuccessful areas were: participation of rural residents, improved street access and improved street pavement, which also agree with Jamshidian , Latifi  and Afrakhteh et al. . Regression results showed that improved cultural services, healthcare and commerce increased villager satisfaction.
The full implementation proposed for land use, such as business development, health services and cultural services, can have a significant impact on villager satisfaction. Increased funding is recommended for full implementation of the plan because the small budgets allocated for the rural master plan has caused some projects to not be fully implemented and may not achieve the desired goals. This study shows that participation in rural construction projects is low. The following recommendations are proposed: informing the residents fully about the master plan goals through training courses, publications and creation of conditions that allow participation of the villagers in the preparation and implementation of the rural master plan.
This study was based on a research project financially supported by Isfahan University of Technology, Iran, which is highly appreciated.
|||Afrakhteh, H., 2011. Evaluation of implementation the rural master plan with emphasis on people consent, National conference on geography and rural development planning, Iran: Mashhad.|
|||Ahmadi, Gh. Vafadar, K., 2011. Economic and social impacts, organization projects on Mazandaran province villages, National conference on geography and rural development planning, Iran: Mashhad.|
|||Amar, T. Samimi, Sh., 2008. Evaluation of physical Effects implementation the rural master plan, JHRE, pp: 44-56.|
|||Anabestani, A., 2009. Physical impacts the rural master plan, National conference on housing and Physical development of rural, Iran: Sistan.|
|||Asgari, F., 2004. Master plan Dashti village in Iran, Master's thesis.|
|||Azimi, N. Jamshidian, M., 2004. Physical Effects implementation the rural master plan, JFAUP, vol.22, pp: 25-34.|
|||Daneshpour, A. Moradpour, R., 2006. Location of rural settlements, shahrnegar, vol.45, pp: 12-23.|
|||Dolfos, O., 1994. Geography analysis, Nika publication.|
|||Gholamrezaie, M., 2003, the performance evaluation the rural master plan in Lorestan Province, Master's thesis.|
|||Latifi, S. Sadi, H. and Fathi, H., 2011. Evaluation of implementation the rural master plan in Hamedan province in Iran, National conference on geography and rural development planning, Iran: Mashhad.|
|||Management and Planning Organization of Mazandaran province, 2006. http://www.mpo-mz.ir.|
|||Masoom, J., 2003. What is the rural master plan? Dhyary magazine, vol.3, pp: 34-37.|
|||Moradi, M. Abtahi, A. and Shahsavandi, I., 2009. Evaluation of implementation the rural master plan in rural development in Iran, National conference on housing and Physical development of rural, Iran: Sistan.|
|||Papoli Yazdi, M., 2007. Rural development theory, Samt publication.|
|||Robbinson, P., 2003. Implications of rural settlement patterns for development (a case study in Quakeni, Eastern cape, South Africa), develop South Africa, Vol.20, pp: 405-427.|
|||Shamsuddin. A., 2008. The impacts implementation master plan in reducing rural migration, JHRE, vol.10, pp: 34-49.|
|||Tarshizi, M. Majidi, Gh., 2003. Master plan, Village development document, Dhyary magazine, vol.4, pp: 4-10.|
|||White, I., 1998. Pre-improvement rural settlement in Scotland: progress and prospects, Scottish Geo, vol.114, pp: 76-84.|