Open Access Peer-reviewed

Farm Labour Structure and Its Determinants among Cocoa Farmers in Nigeria

K.A. Oluyole1,, O.A. Dada1, O.A. Oni2, S. Adebiyi1, O.O. Oduwole1

1Cocoa Research Institute of Nigeria, Ibadan, Nigeria

2Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria

American Journal of Rural Development. 2013, 1(1), 1-5. DOI: 10.12691/ajrd-1-1-1
Published online: August 25, 2017

Abstract

Nigerian agriculture is characterized with the use of hoe-cutlass technology. This is because in Nigeria, most farming activities are carried out with the use of human labour. Hence, labour is a limiting factor in agricultural production in Nigeria. In cocoa production, there is an information gap regarding the structure of labour used. In view of this, it is therefore imperative for this study to investigate the structure of farm labour as well as the determinants of labour use in cocoa production in the study area. Stratified sampling technique was used to select one hundred respondents from the study area. Two high cocoa producing Local Government Areas (LGAs) were selected and from each LGA, five communities were randomly selected. Ten cocoa farmers were randomly selected from each community. The data collected from the respondents were analysed with descriptive as well as multivariate regression model. Descriptive analysis shows that majority (80%) of the respondents are small scale holders having between one and five hectares of cocoa farm. Most (44.0%) utilized sharecropping source of labour. Ninety-four percent of the farmers utilized hired labour for farm clearing while 61.0% and 51% of the farmers utilized family labour for harvesting and on-farm cocoa processing respectively. All the farmers used male labour for farm clearing while 60.0% utilized female labour for harvesting. The result of the multi-variate regression analysis shows that wage rate (p < 0.05), farm size (p < 0.01) as well farm income (p < 0.01) significantly affected the use of labour for cocoa production in the study area. The result of hypothesis testing shows that there is a significant relationship between labour structure and farm size, wage rate and labour cost. The paper however recommended that rural infrastructural facilities should be provided as this would encourage the youths to stay on farms thereby increases farm labour strength.

Keywords:

farm labour, cocoa production, hired labour, sharecropping, farmers, stratified sample
[1]  Ayanwale, B. A. Family investment in the Education of Children and Adolescents in Rural Osun State, Nigeria. In: Issues in African Rural Development Monograph Series. No. 21 Winrock International. pp. 9. 2002.
 
[2]  Oluyole, K. A., Oni, O. A., Omonona, B. T. and Adenegan, K. O. Food Security Among Cocoa Farming Households of Ondo State, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science. 4 (5): 7-13. 2009.
 
[3]  Okuneye, P. A. “Employment Generating Potentials of Agricultural Processing and Storage Technology: Additional Gain in Increased Food Availability Pursuit” Paper presented at the workshop for local government officials in Lagos state. 2000.
 
[4]  Oluyole, K. A., Adebiyi, S. and Adejumo, M. O. An Assessment of the Adoption of Cocoa Rehabilitation Techniques Among Cocoa Farmers in Ijebu East Local Government Area of Ogun state. Journal of Agricultural Research and Policies. 2 (1): 56-60. 2007.
 
[5]  Gocowski, J. and Oduwole, S. Labour Practices in the Cocoa Sector of Southwest Nigeria with a special focus on the role of children. STCP/IITA monograph IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria. 2003.
 
[6]  Lele, U.R. and Stone, S. W. Population, Resource, the Environment and Agricultural Intensification: Variations on the Boserup Hypothesis. MADIA Discussion Paper No. 4, Washington D.C: The World Bank. 1989.
 
[7]  Uwaka, C. T. Cross-Cultural Diffusion of Adult Education: The Role of Agricultural Extension Staff in East Central States of Nigeria. Education Doctor Dissertation, University of Nigeria, Nsuka. 1982.
 
[8]  Iwueke, C. C. Farm Related Factors Influencing the Adoption of Innovation in Imo state. University of Nigeria. pp. 77. 1987.
 
[9]  Harris, J. R. Developing of the Labour Surplus Economy: Theory and Policy. Illinois Homewood Press. 1970.
 
[10]  Obibuaku, L. O. Agricultural Extension as a Strategy for Rural Transformation. University of Nigeria, Nsuka Press. 1983.
 
[11]  Gill, G. J. Seasonality and Agriculture in the Developing World: A problem of the poor and powerless, Cambridge University Press. 1991.View Article
 
[12]  Adebayo, A. Youth unemployment and the national directorate of employment self-employment programme. The Nigerian Journal of Social and Economic Studies. 41:81-104. 1999.
 
[13]  Olayide, S. O. Nigerian Small Scale Farmers. Problems and Prospects. In: S.O.Olayide, J.A. Eweka, V.E. Bello-Osagie (eds.). Nigerian Small Farmers: Problems and Prospects in Integrated Rural Development. Centre for Agricultural and Rural Development, University of Ibadan, Nigeria. pp. 2-15. 1980.
 
[14]  Pala, A. O. African Women in Rural Development: Research trends and priorities. American Overseas Liaison Committee, Washington. 1976.
 
[15]  Martha, F. L. Rural Women: Unequal Partners in Development. International Labour Organization publications, 3rd Ed; Switzerland. 1982.
 
[16]  ILO. Every Child Counts: New Global Estimates on Child Labour. ILO Report 23. Geneva: ILO. 2002.
 
[17]  Akinsorotan, A. O. Concept of labour pattern among cocoa farmers in Ondo state, Journal of Rural Economic Development. 13 (1): 85-95. 1997.
 
[18]  Awolala, D. O. Labour Utilization and Productivity in Cocoa Production in Ondo State, Msc Project of the Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, Federal University of Technology, Akure. 2006.
 
[19]  Oluyole, K. A. Evaluation of the Economics of Post Harvest Processing of Cocoa in Cross River State, Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture, Forestry and the Social Sciences. 3 (2): 58-64. 2005.
 
[20]  .Ogunlade, M. O., Oluyole, K. A. and Aikpokpodion, P. O. An Evaluation of the level of Fertilizer Utilization for Cocoa Production in Nigeria. Journal of Human Ecology. 25 (3): 175-178. 2009.