Figures index

From

Multi-objective Job Shop Scheduling under Risk Using GA

Jaber S. Alzahrani

American Journal of Industrial Engineering. 2019, 6(1), 1-12 doi:10.12691/ajie-6-1-1
  • Figure 1. Gantt chart of makespan objective [[52]]
  • Figure 2. Optimal makespan distribution
  • Figure 3. Inputs ranked by the effect on makespan mean
  • Figure 4. The resulted in maximum tardiness while optimizing the makespan
  • Figure 5. The resulted in maximum machine idle time while optimizing the makespan
  • Figure 6. The resulted in multi-objectives (Equal weights) while optimizing the makespan
  • Figure 7. The resulted in Multi-objectives (double weighted makespan) while optimizing the makespan
  • Figure 8. The resulted in Multi-objectives (double weighted maximum job tardiness) while optimizing the makespan
  • Figure 9. The resulted in Multi-objectives (double weighted maximum machine idle time) while optimizing the makespan
  • Figure 10. Optimal maximum job tardiness distribution
  • Figure 11. Inputs ranked by the effect on maximum job tardiness
  • Figure 12. Optimal maximum machine idle time distribution
  • Figure 13. Inputs ranked by the effect on the maximum machine idle time
  • Figure 14. Optimal multi-objectives (Equal weights) distribution
  • Figure 15. Inputs ranked by the effect on the multi-objectives (Equal weights)
  • Figure 16. Optimal multi-objective (double weighted makespan) distribution
  • Figure 17. Inputs ranked by the effect on the multi-objectives (double weighted makespan)
  • Figure 18. Optimal multi-objective (double weighted maximum job tardiness) distribution
  • Figure 19. Inputs ranked by the effect on the multi-objectives (double weighted maximum job tardiness)
  • Figure 20. Optimal Multi-objective (double weighted maximum machine idle time) distribution
  • Figure 21. Inputs ranked by the effect on the multi-objectives (double weighted maximum machine idle time)