Tables index

From

Environmental Evaluation of the Mining Industry, Proposal of a New Method: Mining Environmental Impact Assessment Methodology (MEIAM)

Kouadio Assemien Francois Yao, Yapi Désiré Sosthène Atto, Koffi Chiayé Larissa, David Salze, Yao Blaise Koffi, Miguel Lopez-Ferber

Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 2025, 13(3), 64-82 doi:10.12691/aees-13-3-2
  • Table 1. Definition of terms used (most coming from risk analysis)
  • Table 2. Comparison of the relative importance of a pair of criteria (adapted from )
  • Table 3. Classification of predisposition factors (groundwater pollution case)
  • Table 4. Classification of predisposition values
  • Table 5. Severity class of the "water pollution" (adapted from )
  • Table 6. Results corresponding to factors of vulnerability to pollution of the groundwater of Afema
  • Table S1: Pairwisecomparison matrix of the criteria
  • Table S2: Illustration of the first step of calculatingEigenvectors and Weights
  • Table S3: Illustration of calculatingof Eigenvectors and Weights
  • Table S4: Values of the Random Index (RI) for smallproblems
  • Table S5: Bio-concentrationfactorsobtained in the literature for the metalsstudied
  • Table S6: Statistical variables of the parametersused to calculate the WQI
  • Table S7: Estimatedseverity of pollutants: Cd, Pb, As, Hg, CN and petroleumhydrocarbons
  • Table S8: Estimation of the groundwaterpredisposition
  • Table S9: Impacts assessment of Afema gold mine (groundwater pollution)
  • Table S10: Main conclusions of the EIA report/Impacts assessment of Afema gold mine (water/groundwater issue)
  • Table S11: Comparisonof MEIAM and EIA impact assessmentresults (groundwater pollution)